IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting

Dmitry Burkov <dburk@burkov.aha.ru> Fri, 03 August 2012 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dburk@burkov.aha.ru>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E3321F8DA0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:46:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.273
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_RU=0.595, HELO_IS_SMALL6=0.556, HOST_EQ_RU=0.875]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id umTJL3UXWAqp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aha.ru (backend13.aha.ru [62.113.86.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749B521F8DEB for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [91.76.219.195] (account dburk@burkov.aha.ru HELO [192.168.1.5]) by backend13.aha.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.11) with ESMTPSA id 310680893; Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:46:08 +0400
Subject: Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Dmitry Burkov <dburk@burkov.aha.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20120803182500.1F9512344DBF@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 22:46:07 +0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1938E5FD-57DE-4172-834A-55CA1FDAF29A@burkov.aha.ru>
References: <20120802184436.87A0318C11F@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <CAMm+Lwg2HgO-=9ED4vbmO+Vf9r6bYPcLDgfyMAyPdEPVgRm4LQ@mail.gmail.com> <FB949BEA-5BDB-401A-8A75-E9A9BDAA72A6@ripe.net> <20120803182500.1F9512344DBF@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 18:46:13 -0000

Mark,
I really enjoyed your professional remarks for the years and your deep and intrinsic mind,
but it seems that now it is not a time to discuss the issue that ipv4 is scarce resource :)


My opinion that IPv6 was done in the worst manner and we should simply recognize that we have no other way to satisfy industry needs in such short time. 

Nothing personal - as a lot of my friends spent significant part of their life on it.

Dima

On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:25 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:

> 
> In message <FB949BEA-5BDB-401A-8A75-E9A9BDAA72A6@ripe.net>, Daniel Karrenberg w
> rites:
>> 
>> On 02.08.2012, at 22:41, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>> 
>>> ... That depends on whether the registry in question is dealing with a
>>> scarce resource or a plentiful one. Having two registries handing out
>>> IPv4 addresses at this point would be very very bad. Having more than
>>> one place you can get an IPv6 from would not worry me at all. ...
>> 
>> IPv4 addresses used to be regarded as non-scarce not so long ago.
> 
> I don't know what planet you have been living on but it was clear
> IPv4 addresses were a scarce resource 2+ decades ago longer than
> some IETF attendees have been alive.  IPv6 was started because they
> were a scarce resource that would run out in the foreseeable future.
> 
> Mark
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email