IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Meeting "lounges" at IETF meetings

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 03 August 2012 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5985421E8051 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D3xGEn-trgpn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72A321E8049 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-2066.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-2066.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.32.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q73HphdP095318 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:51:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Subject: Re: Meeting "lounges" at IETF meetings
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBDyN6VaL3fgYe+C+o9d93VZ1bR_EDmrPN7-Sv+7BiJ9+Q9AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 11:42:53 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <345BE467-B3CA-41EE-9577-6985E3555C8A@vpnc.org>
References: <D7F9B7BE-0ED6-4B8C-808C-C75FA1A6800B@vpnc.org> <CAHBDyN6VaL3fgYe+C+o9d93VZ1bR_EDmrPN7-Sv+7BiJ9+Q9AA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mary Barnes <mary.ietf.barnes@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: ietf list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 18:42:58 -0000

On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:

> Instead, I think we should ensure that future venues have adequate space for both circulating between meeting rooms and for side conversations.

Just to be clear: you would rather that we pay higher meeting fees in exchange for that adequate space?

> I suggest that you could cut the cookie budget if funds really are the only reason this wouldn't be done. 

That is one way to pay for the extra space; it might not be so popular in this particular crowd.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email