Re: So, where to repeat? (was:Re: management granularity)

Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com> Wed, 08 August 2012 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <geoff@proto6.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763EC11E8107 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.149, BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_BEST=2.3, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZ8bfe1CjKTN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.coslabs.com (mail.coslabs.com [199.233.92.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA20311E80D5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.36] (unknown [184.99.9.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.coslabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 284B15F75F; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:39:07 -0600 (MDT)
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF280CE839F@PACDCEXMB06.cable.comcast.com> <501EC24B.4080709@bbiw.net> <20120806120547.GA20379@crankycanuck.ca> <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA234677B967@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9B1@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <E4873516F3FC7547BCFE792C7D94039C02314C5E@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9E4@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <CAHBDyN5NLoJWMXEa8EdEVWxtUxm5XsuCjmqD4xn_N=2=7vKGXg@mail.gmail.com> <01ae01cd7412$abe83e50$03b8baf0$@us> <3983.1344298475@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
In-Reply-To: <3983.1344298475@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <DDA0D4A0-4D9D-44A3-A200-CF807D41919F@proto6.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206)
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com>
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was:Re: management granularity)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:39:10 -0600
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 09:50:55 -0700
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:39:10 -0000

The Orlando airport is a nightmare almost any time and will be even worse during this upcoming IETF.  When I had my FlyClear card it was the only airport where I ever felt that it was necessary.

Avoiding Orlando during the many weeks a spring break would have been good.

Geoff




On Aug 6, 2012, at 6:14 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

> 
>> I've never been to an IETF meeting where the plane fare has exceeded the
>> hotel cost for a week. 
> 
> note: I pay my own way, and make all my own arrangements.
> 
> The only meetings where my hotel costs exceeded my transporation costs
> were the Montreal IETFs (I live in Ottawa).  When I've flown I have
> seldom ever been on direct flights.
> 
> I *do* avoid the main hotel if the price is poor.  I did get the
> Sheraton Wall (backup hotel IETF84), via hotwire.com, which surprised me.
> 
> I find staying over saturday night no longer has any affect on my travel
> costs. 
> 
> I do prefer returning to the same places, and I do like Minneapolis.
> (Yes, even in March and November)
> 
> I am more concerned that we have three north-american IETFs in a row
> (Vancouver, Atlanta, Orlando), and 4 of the next 6 are in North America.
> (Not counting Hawaii as North America for the purposes of travel
> budgets, or it's be 5/7)
> 
> I'm also concerned about going popular places (Quebec, Orlando) during
> peak tourist season. 
> 
> -- 
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works 
>