IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: So, where to repeat? (was:Re: management granularity)

Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org> Tue, 07 August 2012 00:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mrw@lilacglade.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE72411E80ED for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -95.707
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.707 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D=1.597, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FM_DDDD_TIMES_2=1.999, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=2.426, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vMFlYvJ2nrYv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ec2-23-21-76-251.compute-1.amazonaws.com (ec2-23-21-76-251.compute-1.amazonaws.com [23.21.76.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167BC11E8087 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 17:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lilac-too.home (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB6EB2002D; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 20:18:34 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was:Re: management granularity)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-6-919354687"
From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@lilacglade.org>
In-Reply-To: <01ae01cd7412$abe83e50$03b8baf0$@us>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:19:34 -0400
Message-Id: <841C1C01-5581-4535-8B13-3201E3199821@lilacglade.org>
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF280CE839F@PACDCEXMB06.cable.comcast.com> <501EC24B.4080709@bbiw.net> <20120806120547.GA20379@crankycanuck.ca> <B5630A95D803744A81C51AD4040A6DAA234677B967@ESESSCMS0360.eemea.ericsson.se> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9B1@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <E4873516F3FC7547BCFE792C7D94039C02314C5E@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.net> <B31EEDDDB8ED7E4A93FDF12A4EECD30D24EBA9E4@GLKXM0002V.GREENLNK.net> <CAHBDyN5NLoJWMXEa8EdEVWxtUxm5XsuCjmqD4xn_N=2=7vKGXg@mail.gmail.com> <01ae01cd7412$abe83e50$03b8baf0$@us>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:19:51 -0000

+1

On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:
> [RS> ] +1 and no employer ever argued that going to Minneapolis was a boondoggle.  The Hilton in Minneapolis  of all the IETF meetings I’ve attended has the most optimal layout of meeting rooms etc.
>  
> If we were to choose one place in the U.S. to meet, Minneapolis is the best choice IMHO.  It's very reasonably priced, easy for many to get to and the hotel has adequate space for us (even back when we had many more attendees).  Personally, the weather is not critical to me, since I spend the vast majority of my time in the hotel meeting rooms, so I'm very happy if we meet there in March and November.   
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email