Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Thu, 09 August 2012 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7758121F874A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.395
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.395 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.204, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eqh48XQDSJkD for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AAC21F8738 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 08:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q79FHXg5030347; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:17:33 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {5023D19D-0-1B221DC2-4FFFF}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 18:17:33 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 18:17:34 +0300
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Thread-Topic: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Thread-Index: Ac12QhlgCKrfnXiUSM2DKkLsx6hyyw==
Message-ID: <6F255DD8-325B-4FA1-AD65-2A75555260FA@checkpoint.com>
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net> <AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com> <01af01cd74f5$217e5770$647b0650$@us> <5021CDDE.8060207@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208071937500.20339@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <B33DB90A-5819-4CEE-AE99-DAEC5CC5425C@proto6.com> <5022B4B2.8040904@bbiw.net> <79607D9B-40A1-4EE7-9C1A-B93B492D2802@proto6.com> <5023D21D.7030408@bbiw.net>
In-Reply-To: <5023D21D.7030408@bbiw.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:17:46 -0000

On Aug 9, 2012, at 6:07 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

> offlist.

Not so much

> Geoff,
> 
> Frankfurt is a city in Germany.  I believe the IETF has never been there.

Two more tidbits:
 - It's a huge aviation hub. There are direct flights from everywhere, similar to CDG, Heathrow, or Schiphol
 - Unlike Paris, London and Amsterdam, it's not a great tourist attraction, so conceivably it would be cheaper.

> Other than those two tidbits about it, I've no idea what is to be 
> accomplished by someone's randomly throwing out the names of cities for 
> a discussion like this, especially when threads like these always have a 
> great deal of trouble staying focused on the /principle/ rather than 
> haggling the details.

The principle would be to go to aviation hubs so as to minimize the collective pain. Most people from the US going to Prague, would have a connection in Frankfurt, so a meeting in Frankfurt would reduce the amount of flights.

Yoav

> On 8/8/2012 12:24 PM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
>> Frankfurt?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 12:49 PM, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 8/8/2012 11:46 AM, Geoff Mulligan wrote:
>>>> So then why not consider, London, Paris (not the Concorde Lafayette), Frankfurt, Amsterdam?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> shockingly, amsterdam can't handle the ietf.  wrong mix of resources. really.
>>> 
>>> paris appears to have broad crime and work-ethic patterns that also are problematic, not just at the concorde.
>>> 
>>> to be clear: i'm speaking for myself.
>>> 
>>> d/
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Dave Crocker
>>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>>> bbiw.net
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
>  Dave Crocker
>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>  bbiw.net
> 
> Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.