IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

"Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com> Wed, 08 August 2012 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC4221F85B4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 01:04:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z7rPjx4FrNti for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 01:04:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (demumfd002.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A8D21F84F3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 01:04:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.56]) by demumfd002.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q7883teY020146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:03:57 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.32.94]) by demuprx017.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id q7883nnh003180; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:03:50 +0200
Received: from DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.128.17]) by DEMUEXC048.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 10:03:42 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 10:03:41 +0200
Message-ID: <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A6404184034@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Thread-Index: Ac106DvOpW6CHOT9SX+HRmJKOOOpQAAVAeTA
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com><502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net><AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk><EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com>
From: "Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>
To: ext Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Aug 2012 08:03:42.0867 (UTC) FILETIME=[53D68E30:01CD753C]
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-size: 883
X-purgate-ID: 151667::1344413037-00002E58-9952E6EB/0-0/0-0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 08:04:27 -0000

> I'll bet Dublin would be rated higher if the meetings had been
downtown.  

Indeed.

Mehmet 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of ext Steve
> Crocker
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:01 AM
> To: Tim Chown
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
> 
> I'll bet Dublin would be rated higher if the meetings had been
downtown.  Same for
> Vienna.
> 
> Steve
> 
> On Aug 7, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Tim Chown wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > My top three repeat venues would be Prague, Minneapolis and
Vancouver.  Great
> meeting venues, with everything you need nearby.
> >
> > My least favoured venues have been Dublin, Vienna and Maastricht.
> >
> > Of course, you have to experiment to find good repeat venues...
> >
> > Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email