IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Mon, 07 October 2013 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD95821E81D2; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z6X0oaHI+rHU; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D7A121E80E6; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 16:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc-vpn3-515.cisco.com (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85DD5414C7; Mon, 7 Oct 2013 17:38:08 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <52534471.4050302@stpeter.im>
Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 17:32:01 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
References: <20131007164829.16131.73595.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMB4VX7mABG=oZ16uNu3zOT-1-h0K5dEN68RW92X9ER59w@mail.gmail.com> <52530CCF.8090605@gmail.com> <F854C30D-78C6-4FCF-BC48-AB1E7C270164@nominum.com> <20131007232314.GC48229@verdi>
In-Reply-To: <20131007232314.GC48229@verdi>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 23:32:21 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/7/13 5:23 PM, John Leslie wrote:
> Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 7, 2013, at 3:34 PM, Brian E Carpenter
>> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> So I'd like to dispute Ted's point that by publishing a version
>>> of resnick-on-consensus as an RFC, we will engrave its contents
>>> in stone. If that's the case, we have an even deeper problem
>>> than misunderstandings of rough consensus.
>> 
>> Right, I think what Ted is describing is a BCP, not an
>> Informational RFC.
> 
> Oh my! I just saw the IESG agenda, and this _is_ proposed for BCP.

It might not be the first time that an IESG agenda has the wrong text
for intended status.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=3AY7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email