IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 08 October 2013 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E048721E8240; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Sg-JfrWqk18; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og114.obsmtp.com (exprod7og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.215]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3952921E8266; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob114.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUlQzYaD7JubM7G6t9WyCp2q5TYJdQVh2@postini.com; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 09:31:29 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CC61B814F; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:31:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB699190061; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:31:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:31:28 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1811\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-on-consensus-05.txt> (On Consensus and Humming in the IETF) to Informational RFC
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMDMUjnFwYD2NFjiWx0dMmNOFNerXQtwp6urco+F7-ffTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 12:31:27 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <4B683894-92F1-465C-9278-EB8D45AC96C7@nominum.com>
References: <20131007164829.16131.73595.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CA+9kkMB4VX7mABG=oZ16uNu3zOT-1-h0K5dEN68RW92X9ER59w@mail.gmail.com> <52530CCF.8090605@gmail.com> <F854C30D-78C6-4FCF-BC48-AB1E7C270164@nominum.com> <CA+9kkMDMUjnFwYD2NFjiWx0dMmNOFNerXQtwp6urco+F7-ffTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1811)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 16:31:36 -0000

On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> To be clear here, I did not think Pete's document was going for BCP. 

Indeed, but you are speaking of it as if it were, which was my point.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email