Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 09 December 2014 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930FE1A1B12 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:01:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvSqGD8sjt-x for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19081A6FF9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:01:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09B526405D; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:01:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=O3J4RcmOPW+Vut TAzCvVBSiAjPs=; b=acM17BhBRXMj1rLaTMG7RQWXbBEjDcie7oFAm8Hd0nCTOg Lgb3wXCow6L5AqsSW2snscArCukWNU6bhl/CM2kaXtM5sizp2ETXPAEEqWQtI71s +6c30OIb0YTn/+WiWbb/i8WdqBIVVeRacGN1ek4Cd32JLt16Bqk3H06ZqCMLs=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a88.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 43FA0264058; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 09:01:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:01:24 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20
Message-ID: <20141209170119.GA12979@localhost>
References: <20141209163604.11502.qmail@ary.lan> <54872728.5050903@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54872728.5050903@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_vEmMchs9ba8h1jT42WvZ3C8ZLE
Cc: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:01:33 -0000

On Tue, Dec 09, 2014 at 08:45:28AM -0800, Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 12/9/2014 8:36 AM, John Levine wrote:
> > That means nobody can cite a printed book, or an article from an ACM
> > or IEEE journal.  (To the extent the latter two are online, they're
> > PDFs behind a paywall.)
> > 
> > This seems to me to be making rules for the sake of making rules, not
> > because there is a problem that needs to be solved.
> 
> Well, there is certainly a higher barrier to access for a paper document
> or one behind a paywall than there is for something that is only one
> click away.

Whoops, I wasn't clear!  I meant that new RFCs must be available online
(obviously, old ones that can't be found online... might never be).

Further down in my post this became clear when I pointed out that we
can't require external docs to be available online.  But it should have
been clear here.

Nico
--