Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Mon, 08 December 2014 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE84E1A6FE8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:38:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IwyMo9wKSEVS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f41.google.com (mail-la0-f41.google.com [209.85.215.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD731A6FDF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id hv19so3467393lab.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:38:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Eu8MGAAXN7p/g4d6hphqkDAomZgdIzMlT8FNZzD+nXA=; b=ZxKaXZlFBY4b7Ofv0XnjpCKwr6FudAroRkwvKZHKg9L5X3zaxohu7p0sVVHj8OcM+U uOD2Q5hlRjNVq5DMGjQM9ffVT81ynuuTa6n+QkIk7IBKNGJiw7nOZEo0n+jRb1aW855K 3tVBuIoFJJXLPw7eTIYza+n7BwRps8n4mrYyPBd2aOEdLOJ7sGhBzUgoLnnFW5LaB5T0 zsfrUiF1Q52ps6DzwfazAg30tu2FZZObI9jiH/GaJDI4Ev2sMQw6M094JWcL30GUasFq gEVrZtr85MLLLxD+emS4Ri3hoV4Cb14KVET954OM8nbWI6j0kyZan43DueCORcgLgl9P 5kXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmkSThxRQK10Vpb6/PpKRDdgnQ/nxAQpuapFx2XRXaa9Tdl8MNlTqgdknleEiljs12Cg0Aa
X-Received: by 10.112.16.39 with SMTP id c7mr14776978lbd.19.1418024298824; Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:38:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.2.212 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2014 23:37:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [24.84.235.32]
In-Reply-To: <12AE30EF-529A-4B47-A40C-A2E0EE5A6317@frobbit.se>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936289DC7@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <89601952-AA04-44EE-A6DA-E76D0AB07C21@frobbit.se> <20141207180528.GA1116@mercury.ccil.org> <D4E95FE1-0C25-4541-8327-16313175F13A@frobbit.se> <20141207210754.GA18507@mercury.ccil.org> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D2432779493628C75E@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <12AE30EF-529A-4B47-A40C-A2E0EE5A6317@frobbit.se>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 23:37:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6iu2F=XMu32155ktXXzK0O4p+-ud8jUjYr8ZDosSusDNLw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3c78e9d59ae0509af82ad"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/iL92hcyY8EO5FNeBJWV9twdaqe8
Cc: "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>, "General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:38:22 -0000
I agree 100% that the fact that JSON Text Sequences MUST BE UTF-8 should be highlighted. Both the ASCII and Unicode names of 30/0x1e/00011110 should, for completeness, be provided. It would be inappropriate to omit ASCII, because we picked 0x1e because of its ASCII name. On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote: > > > On 8 dec 2014, at 03:59, Black, David <david.black@emc.com> wrote: > > > > OLD > > In prose: any number of JSON texts, each preceded by one ASCII RS > > character and each followed by a line feed (LF). > > NEW > > In prose: any number of JSON texts encoded as UTF-8, each preceded > > by one ASCII RS character and each followed by a line feed (LF). > > > > My point is that you do not have to talk about ASCII RS. You can as well > talk about the UTF-8 encoding of the unicode character INFORMATION > SEPARATOR TWO, U+001E. Much cleaner. > > Just say it must be UTF-8 encoded text, done. > > Patrik > > > _______________________________________________ > json mailing list > json@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json > > -- - Tim Bray (If you’d like to send me a private message, see https://keybase.io/timbray)
- Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-tex… Black, David
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Barry Leiba
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Black, David
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… John Levine
- Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir re… John C Klensin
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… John C Klensin
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… John C Klensin
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Status of RFC 20 Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… l.wood
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… John C Klensin
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… l.wood
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… Dave Cridland
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… Barry Leiba
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Patrik Fältström
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Status of RFC 20 Carsten Bormann
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Pete Resnick
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Patrik Fältström
- Re: Status of RFC 20 joel jaeggli
- Re: Status of RFC 20 John C Klensin
- Re: Status of RFC 20 joel jaeggli
- RE: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Black, David
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Tim Bray
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… John Cowan
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Nico Williams
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Nico Williams
- Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status of … Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Patrik Fältström
- Re: Status of RFC 20 Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Nico Williams
- Re: Integrity protection for RFCs (was Re: Status… manning bill
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Patrik Fältström
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… Patrik Fältström
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20 John Levine
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Black, David
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20 Dave Crocker
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20 Nico Williams
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… John Cowan
- Re: Status of RFC 20 Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Nico Williams
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Black, David
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20 Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Cited documents, was Status of RFC 20 John C Klensin
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Nico Williams
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Matthew Kerwin
- Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Nico Williams
- RE: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json… Black, David
- Re: [Json] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ie… John Cowan
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… Julian Reschke
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… ned+ietf
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… John C Klensin
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… John C Klensin
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… ned+ietf
- Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Di… John C Klensin