IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Sun, 30 January 2011 04:50 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B49B3A6AE3; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:50:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q07txgfZ4Tbc; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:50:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9F33A6A6B; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:50:46 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAD59RE2rR7Ht/2dsb2JhbACkenOgapoehU4EhROHDoNF
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2011 04:53:57 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.3] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0U4rUUN015483; Sun, 30 Jan 2011 04:53:55 GMT
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C9675BFE.2B995%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 20:53:55 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C43339C1-88B4-41E9-9CA1-3591338AC6C0@cisco.com>
References: <C9675BFE.2B995%michelle.cotton@icann.org>
To: Michelle Cotton <michelle.cotton@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 04:50:49 -0000

On Jan 27, 2011, at 17:29 , Michelle Cotton wrote:

> We are changing that process right now.  We have begun to report the
> reviewer (with the review) in the email to the requester.
> 
> We just need to make sure this small change is communicated to those experts
> that are part of review "teams" as their individual names are not published
> on the main list of registries.
> 
> I don't think it needs to go in this document as this is already in
> progress.
> 
> Let me know if you have any questions.

As long as we agree that is the process, it's not a big deal to me if it is in or out of the document but I don't see any reason not to put it into the document.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email