IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com> Tue, 08 February 2011 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326673A6859; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:41:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W8r6ecTio7+G; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270773A6835; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.178) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:41:37 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.68) by TK5EX14MLTC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.2; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:41:37 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.204]) by TK5EX14MLTW652.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.68]) with mapi; Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:41:37 -0800
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
To: Chris Benson <cbenson@adax.com>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
Thread-Index: AQHLx65uYHyiMSXjuU2y+c+m+OGflZP4EPgQ
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:41:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CEBCE3CF81D2D441B14B84256C3C46810BD95BD8@TK5EX14MBXW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <20110118212603.5733.34489.idtracker@localhost> <B88A8A82-9C4A-40AC-89AF-F177260760F7@cisco.com> <ECA80A72-4E72-44D2-B40E-C90D7197E8C5@nokia.com> <4D421795.70505@isi.edu> <tslbp2vh8ig.fsf@mit.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102071321290.4671@adax.adax>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102071321290.4671@adax.adax>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:41:32 -0000

> I don't see that "public identity" (of expert reviewers) is required for "interactive discussion".  
> Or would anonymous interaction fail a Turing test of some kind?

Public identity is required for reviewer accountability. It is easy to imagine how withholding registration of some required numbers may delay a competitor's products. The best protection against shade is sunlight.

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email