IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis

manning bill <bmanning@isi.edu> Thu, 05 March 2015 17:00 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6B01A1A94; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:00:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eLt6xy5dc7Dw; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:00:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EFD21A1B2C; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.32.4.206] ([198.32.4.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t25H06OY025015 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 09:00:16 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: last call discussion status on draft-iab-2870bis
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
From: manning bill <bmanning@isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <D205D042-1285-46D5-B9A1-E732B23A8861@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:00:04 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D1E3F194-34AD-4968-8ACE-7E8D7990413B@isi.edu>
References: <20140520204238.21772.64347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <500031A0-DF45-409E-AACB-F79C32032E38@viagenie.ca> <4B545BEB-EA0E-4BA8-A45E-15AF12CDB1EC@piuha.net> <20150305044122.4185F2AEEC2D@rock.dv.isc.org> <EC564286-9A5E-4702-A8ED-B2C8E404E68A@piuha.net> <6056F80B-2188-4E52-AE18-35E84BA98147@vpnc.org> <D205D042-1285-46D5-B9A1-E732B23A8861@piuha.net>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@isi.edu
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/tSuoKZf_JchW3YWi_PGtLFeXtBw>
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IETF Discussion List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:00:53 -0000

EDNS is essential for the implementation of DNS Security Extensions.   All roots support DNSSEC.
Calling out EDNS0 at this time is moot.

(I’ll say that 2870bis is on thin ice, since the IETF/IAB have no leverage on root server operators.  This community can pontificate at length, but the actual operations will
dictate, not some wish list from an “arms-length” standards body…  Just sayin’)

/bill
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102

On 5March2015Thursday, at 8:43, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:

> 
>> EDNS0 very clearly falls under "best practices": no one can deny that. So, to some extent, the expectation is already on the root server operators to use EDNS0. It's not clear if the IETF saying "here's a thing we insist on" will help the cause.
> 
> Seems reasonable. Thanks.
> 
> Jari
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email