Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Fri, 30 May 2014 06:38 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84A01A06EE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 23:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0g1uhOsqCowH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 23:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffe::176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25F161A02B0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2014 23:38:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::141c:a4ef:c869:8a6d] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc:0:141c:a4ef:c869:8a6d]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D15422C28; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:38:49 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BC8F938E-694F-4395-AA56-6F514BA7D3D2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <32E01C2E-1D13-482A-AB44-FF45A556EAF5@virtualized.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:38:42 +0200
Message-Id: <B5C09A91-F8B4-4F36-BB52-24E798024588@frobbit.se>
References: <20140520204238.21772.64347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140521194638.06eaf508@resistor.net> <1111FB79-012A-414B-B8CD-0BBDAE8BD6A8@hopcount.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20140522095317.0c5fd648@elandnews.com> <5C02BCCA-79D7-40A5-BFB0-26284A667E78@vpnc.org> <DC9ED318-2352-4AF0-8A43-29D237C32B64@vigilsec.com> <924045CD-DC34-423B-8702-CD99CF687D46@vpnc.org> <31344.1401304682@sandelman.ca> <850B843A-3346-408B-9D8B-65D0879A2498@virtualized.org> <C8E791BD-E0A6-437E-B531-A1274DAED970@frobbit.se> <BAE7E773-EAE6-4E81-826C-AAA5AF8F5519@virtualized.org> <41C69E89-26DA-45EB-BDC6-38C404C615F2@frobbit.se> <32E01C2E-1D13-482A-AB44-FF45A556EAF5@virtualized.org>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MD9T0phwxgFz8WkvLRx-XEXP9Pc
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 06:38:57 -0000

On 29 maj 2014, at 22:48, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:

> I'm disappointed that people would argue that Yet Another IETF RFC is required to get folks to do stuff they already know they should be doing.

Aha, then here is where I think we have different opinion.

I do not see this draft be anything people think will change things. I see personally this be an updated version of the RFC stating what IETF do believe should be implemented.

Once again, the enforcement is somewhere else.

But if whatever the enforcement is to refer to is not correct, then it is absolutely for certain the enforcement will not happen.

So, phew, I do not think we are very far away from each other this time either. ;-)

   Patrik