IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com> Thu, 29 May 2014 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55691A078D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 01:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tzSSmVtnpA0c for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 01:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg22.ericsson.net (sesbmg22.ericsson.net [193.180.251.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4271A079D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2014 01:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-f79a56d000006536-f3-5386eea4bf45
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by sesbmg22.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 23.43.25910.4AEE6835; Thu, 29 May 2014 10:24:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.174.1; Thu, 29 May 2014 10:24:04 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EA4110201; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:24:04 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB544E980; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:24:01 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F9B4E857; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:24:00 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_85F9BF99-3715-464D-8E54-90BAA4460750"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-iab-2870bis-01.txt> (DNS Root Name Service Protocol and Deployment Requirements) to Best Current Practice
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <31344.1401304682@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:24:02 +0300
Message-ID: <BF0C8B7B-27D0-40B8-8FBD-5D255951222F@ericsson.com>
References: <20140520204238.21772.64347.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20140521194638.06eaf508@resistor.net> <1111FB79-012A-414B-B8CD-0BBDAE8BD6A8@hopcount.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20140522095317.0c5fd648@elandnews.com> <5C02BCCA-79D7-40A5-BFB0-26284A667E78@vpnc.org> <DC9ED318-2352-4AF0-8A43-29D237C32B64@vigilsec.com> <924045CD-DC34-423B-8702-CD99CF687D46@vpnc.org> <31344.1401304682@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrPLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7Sd23BBitX81k82zifxaLnUD+7 A5PHkiU/mTxa5uxhDmCK4rJJSc3JLEst0rdL4Mr4cvkES8FX44rp96eyNTAeNOxi5OSQEDCR OPZsBQuELSZx4d56ti5GLg4hgaOMEo3LHkA5Gxgl3q79AeXsZZTY2NfBDOGsY5R493IGVGYe o8SM+1tYQBxmgSmMEtdX/mMGmcwrYCCxbvExRpCEsEAHo8TUt0vAEmwCWhIbly9gA7E5BXQk Du08DXYKi4CqxNrma0wgNrOAhkTf2Y9ANRxAg+wltqzRgdjWzSzx6e1csBoRAT2J5UeeMUK8 IS8xo/0EO4StJnH13CawXUICKhK3/p5lm8AoMgvZgbOQHDgLbJ+2xLKFr4HiHEC2jsTkhVBh U4nXRz9C2dYSM34dZIOwFSWmdD9kX8DIvopRtDi1OCk33chIL7UoM7m4OD9PLy+1ZBMjMMYO bvltsIPx5XPHQ4wCHIxKPLwKKm3BQqyJZcWVuYcYpTlYlMR5L2pUBwsJpCeWpGanphakFsUX leakFh9iZOLglGpglCl+c6hGu5Z1ySwLQdtktt2KFfN6FON0D8qLLn3J3n8gTt9xXVhqe2vc pKLFh/1SFc1X/znL0WIRe++fc6jrd0fnsPBm9Ql1u1nrWXdpHZ9sqcDBuPSri9WRxzU8/D88 Ev64b5XxvXw4cvtF7W+LGlPuMb6O6Yzj7z5r4fHw5rNahnc3jnMpsRRnJBpqMRcVJwIAnZ7P cZICAAA=
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/vosJUQOtAm7lxRtBRZcUIp0MxJI
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 May 2014 08:17:27 -0700
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 08:24:13 -0000

> I would like every A-M.root-servers.net have an A and AAAA record.
> 
> I don't care how the root-server operators decide to partition to workload
> among hardware.

Yes, that is my view as well.

> Over time we will need more v6 responders and fewer v4
> responders.
> I don't think that there is, or should be, any requirement that v4 and v6 be
> answered by the same system, and given anycast, they might even be in
> different locations.
> 
> I think that the current text captures this just fine:

Agreed.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email