IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108

Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> Fri, 17 April 2020 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <jay@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AC63A15E0; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOS6YexLMjhP; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jays-mbp.localdomain (unknown [158.140.230.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A73903A15DA; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <F35A2E8F-D800-4387-BCBE-C997AA591D64@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1F41EBE1-48A9-41C7-BAF1-4206DBB7033A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 14:08:50 +1200
In-Reply-To: <0819C111-72B9-4BDF-9F28-3F54955C64A4@mnot.net>
Cc: ietf108planning@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
References: <158708131208.11834.5712314090867877950@ietfa.amsl.com> <0819C111-72B9-4BDF-9F28-3F54955C64A4@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf108planning/2S6JhMYB4sYEw1QJ-5AC01WzHEg>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
X-BeenThere: ietf108planning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf108planning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf108planning/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf108planning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 02:08:56 -0000


> On 17/04/2020, at 2:02 PM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jay,
> 
>> On 17 Apr 2020, at 9:55 am, IETF Executive Director <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Using our records of attendance at recent European IETF meetings we will develop an expected distribution of participants by country (i.e. how many participants we would typically expect from each country).
> 
> Just curious - how many recent European meetings, and which ones? It seems like this could become a point of contention if it's not defined ahead of time.

We’re planning to go back as far as IETF 96 Berlin in 2016 and use that and those since.

Jay

> 
> Cheers,
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
jay@ietf.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email