Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Fri, 17 April 2020 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=13763edbb4=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B45C3A0E56; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:33:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7LIzA82rdcFA; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF4373A0E57; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1587137584; x=1587742384; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:CC:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References: In-Reply-To:Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=PBY6YLfKZNxoyr+PNCf1A+sDuY4Y32x1f1LkYZXZcmQ=; b=IJtldeKsWL/en GYvBddBvWWOWCF8UNmeZsgxyncg+5df8obeDHgg25m6zupLpm2Fl+StBeccT7Uom 6RNZ2/WDS1lhpNwNeHMbj6Tp0Y+tsnWGtKyF/HNEUFc03Rr3AzD6ylxqvKN5iEWf X0w3v52d6KVLJZD2YiRVXuxZpXMX4U=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:33:04 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:33:04 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.144] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50000131046.msg; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:33:02 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:9d95:20ce:d655:7368
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.144]
X-MDArrival-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:33:02 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=13763edbb4=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.36.20041300
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:32:59 +0200
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, ietf108planning@ietf.org
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <A89EDE26-6823-4493-A62A-3230546DACFF@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
References: <158708131208.11834.5712314090867877950@ietfa.amsl.com> <7DB76076-F012-4738-B397-49303DCD81E4@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7DB76076-F012-4738-B397-49303DCD81E4@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf108planning/gmovV9Y8I0VxKXMUoDfJvJgHVBs>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
X-BeenThere: ietf108planning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf108planning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf108planning/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf108planning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 15:33:09 -0000

Hi,

I share your concern, however, the information I've about the health system in Thailand is quite good. In fact, there are "5 start hospitals", very competitive for foreigners.

I guess it all depends on what insurance you have, etc.

However, I'm guessing that traveling to any country, for some time, will require some kind of test that you're Covid-19 free or already immune to it, so being our meeting only one week, it is really difficult to believe that during that week you can be infected and already become ill. If everybody traveling is requested for the same testing, the chances for getting infected in the trip are also low.

Of course, we are somehow speculating, because there are still doubts about if somebody that got already infected is totally immune ...

In general, moving an IETF venue just 6 months in advance (if we do it now), is not an easy task. Maybe, only maybe, right now it will be feasible (assuming IETF the cost of the already contracted one), because many venues got cancellations ...

Regards,
Jordi



 

El 17/4/20 15:31, "ietf en nombre de Stewart Bryant" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de stewart.bryant@gmail.com> escribió:

    Jay

    Whilst I understand that the focus is on IETF108, this dreadful illness is likely to be with us until there is a reliable vaccine widely available. So even it it is under control there will likely be a reservoir of infection for a while and a risk that an IETF participant will fall ill with it during a meeting. 

    That means that we have to consider not only what happens with IETF109 in terms of virtual/F2F but also, if it is F2F whether the medical resources in Bangkok are such that attendees would be comfortable with the quality and quantity of available care and treatment in that city should they be struck by the covid infection during the meeting.

    I am not sure which is the best venue from that point of view, but serious consideration should be given to moving the meeting to a place where a significant majority are happy with the medical facilities.

    Best regards

    Stewart







**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.