IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Fri, 17 April 2020 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DFB3A090D; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W8_uaVzrwk_O; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A184C3A090E; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id t63so1493709wmt.3; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=1gOFR1wM3KR/Yuoqh8tj8gpMYWdeA5y1ySsZcEwEJJo=; b=tpH3Ci6BEJGwD1DsUGwMZxmo3K9dcqS1qCrtJx+i+jKTnzwaChs/oEJU1PdmbzWa+M LQZ42ARBNy7uXsOwR3uGWFowMtWz+gOmq9EBf6JN7sY3utMciKhj037ZiMoZGf1u85t4 Fj5+3z7Mympnu0gaPkVSXYTfjCJib26oYo32z1+6od7Jl8lvuoJEenlPh/eFuXvnFvBN Lh+XZy64laTLTaWaT94ncRAKizEwJ7Qk3QrHZx90KYzzDpnvbQ52ARb3jTHx8Mli9vZ5 3iAGkxrE5VwHeYIRnuGTT03FQkwH+c5idrNGKRMm73A5BN69cet9BVBrzzbc2vo1TKX1 aatg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=1gOFR1wM3KR/Yuoqh8tj8gpMYWdeA5y1ySsZcEwEJJo=; b=lm8zPE1ST+oZ2WiRSr+IEYWessH6xtcWhknheX+QV2UlUkUOslFVXkHPo2FUdG6+Yv 5iQ2yNxjeT/jIMDaLJzJBlNGw7lwpuHRRk81J+44tWLMZwuycJX3uFRBmVGkw9yn0R4q yldnH6zeTtivcPdYsWye2XFo+9+9cadlm3wj8wdYZqbAjT0FSNoMCCkIeZuz3ypULcHs o9ud0UtUOzMSttdEgifNJ8AQMJX1UnQvvWqbT4dOZxMDKk3aRb8hyOuXZWDWVHAiq6ju QGhPM9vpi6I8vwvKxhk3ULm6QLmgws3KEsj67DUHNq/IgSnK7wrYJBDsWbPrsv3J7H3R Mung==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZ3rN5E8ElRMIO+9u4t78eKDVbi0v3yXIUdsW3kt3GtAX7i/Z0c 7MHfujCfTK/7qo5Zu0Hvr+c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLYNk1iVfNe3eAdZUN+mZBdq+PKJ0q6cpU9eIbndkS4wXoLVFkRmcUGJq0x48FwcK3zhZLF8g==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4409:: with SMTP id r9mr2902124wma.165.1587121418082; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from broadband.bt.com ([2a00:23a8:4140:0:60d7:8e14:5e6f:c078]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b82sm7773944wmh.1.2020.04.17.04.03.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 04:03:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3422E9D9-78CE-4DFC-8DC4-8993C155C6E4@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5F35ADF4-C5A1-4C95-8B1D-65D342E08E37"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:03:36 +0100
In-Reply-To: <67B26CDF-2AFA-4788-96A1-06C83086E7C1@consulintel.es>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, ietf108planning@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <158708131208.11834.5712314090867877950@ietfa.amsl.com> <67B26CDF-2AFA-4788-96A1-06C83086E7C1@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf108planning/Cz170nwCKu8Du70rvW_BD_nCHVA>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
X-BeenThere: ietf108planning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf108planning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf108planning/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf108planning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 11:03:41 -0000


> On 17 Apr 2020, at 11:31, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>    The selection of independent sources is more problematic and we have chosen to use the US CDC and their travel advisory for Spain [4], which must be below Warning Level 3 (avoid nonessential travel) or the in-person meeting will not go ahead.  While recognising that the choice of a single US source may be contentious, we believe this is the best choice because all of our contracts have a force majeure clause that specifically lists the US CDC..
> 
> [Jordi] I've not looked at the information of the CDC about Spain, but this seems an US government organization and I'm sorry, but if that's the case, I don't think this is a trustable source.

I find it "so sad" to say so, but I also have concerns about the trustworthiness of statements by the current US Government on this matter.

- Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email