Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 17 April 2020 02:02 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf108planning@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A0C3A15C7; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:02:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=d7p80ssq; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=W2tlsQyq
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZ4ln0dNJpbU; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:02:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54DD43A15C6; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 19:02:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02EA5C0210; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 22:02:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 22:02:12 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=o Zqd8y5KdiKbkPPZGD5ucSKpMre0RfS1sZnLdI3TK18=; b=d7p80ssqePxXbw/i6 21dMTb7TjcqrpQ7vU6FmndzqoRrm9FOauhqwqP5GVhG7/ywt/QITgYUhSAkwzXjf p0BQ6+yVoXZLpNZkxU8Msgd4USZgWKI/Lb8XX/8+i68Q64aX3/sQLhCYcRP33gcV M0gEIVvcJvFUwcd/hvgkky0V71ow5jrVvnkCJz3bDHI61l+6YxxRah+ERfDsdy+9 tnWrPy07z1+h3gcJQk8Gl7TpSYSoPFMwiYNxOAyoJtc/5hpIyxzi5xg54Iyxizx2 rH8eruem1UU6h40X1Zg5uoQeZ8Yv1S89vBbufZsuE9bEHK9gLD5bTouS84WqwEn3 NL4ug==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=oZqd8y5KdiKbkPPZGD5ucSKpMre0RfS1sZnLdI3TK 18=; b=W2tlsQyqHHFoHJAsqGASm3Ppi0zt+YDD9WXTM8Y2FVxl6H00bApM0b9QI rFvyD0OmbnPUIr4cjTq5NtfHkIcfPpSkV0prlukS5cHsP+wDwGIiWPCSKr18AyP2 XR5x8BkP3ypF0lVgQ9n78gCZmz5trt0kDl/MpgFo6FH6+ZMPE6sNbwDDIgu1+/0y e3IusEvIQ2in60Egz29SeZA99b2SczaB4PlOQW+b4L2haJYICvqmxfVOAXdHuI8y O9CI9JrMTJUwN5QPuEoOsmcXnke3JtX1/oXYdZaF1+egeICtSkgKiG+FPPQI6eTf 1sMFMS1rJHF12NI+v+gJVoqVYiPZA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JA6ZXr0Hd6WQjqj_6F-EFOlf9KazqWjMJ6QsNck6UMNH9Bw5TBowzQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrfeeigdehgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpe hmnhhothdrnhgvthenucfkphepudduledrudejrdduheekrddvhedunecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnh gvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JA6ZXlvfX_4MN8x6fLbQXPbuEouex6kPRCXlI16tEmpWVmMF96brjw> <xmx:JA6ZXuByCeOrFkdx-4TWR3xBBMM5zxkxwLslwg7VrYK3GSn839NIXQ> <xmx:JA6ZXvN5O_7XQp3Ra8TSZtroNpbnq5kxAJDuI4MoZpLDpVB5qJByog> <xmx:JA6ZXr9Dr6hkG9X2Jma48h2rZauWY3jRARwYgRaZPrb7IFgEP6yqZA>
Received: from macbook-air.mnot.net (119-17-158-251.77119e.mel.static.aussiebb.net [119.17.158.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 50BB23060086; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 22:02:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <158708131208.11834.5712314090867877950@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:02:08 +1000
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0819C111-72B9-4BDF-9F28-3F54955C64A4@mnot.net>
References: <158708131208.11834.5712314090867877950@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: ietf108planning@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf108planning/t_5jvrbQkx3qQvzbXfsXN4Xk67A>
Subject: Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decision on in-person/virtual IETF 108
X-BeenThere: ietf108planning@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ietf108planning.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf108planning/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf108planning@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf108planning>, <mailto:ietf108planning-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 02:02:19 -0000
Hi Jay, > On 17 Apr 2020, at 9:55 am, IETF Executive Director <exec-director@ietf.org> wrote: > > Using our records of attendance at recent European IETF meetings we will develop an expected distribution of participants by country (i.e. how many participants we would typically expect from each country). Just curious - how many recent European meetings, and which ones? It seems like this could become a point of contention if it's not defined ahead of time. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for decisio… IETF Executive Director
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Eliot Lear
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Rich Kulawiec
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Andrea Glorioso
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Jay Daley
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Larry Masinter
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Ietf108planning] Assessment criteria for dec… Stewart Bryant