Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?

[Hitoshi Asaeda <[e-mail]>]

Ah, sorry, I'm also booked another meeting this noon.
But whenever my meeting is over, I try to join.
Sorry about that.

Hitoshi

> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:24, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?!
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote:
>> Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal?  If so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat?
>> 
>> I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to progress this work, hopefully this week.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Femi
>> 
>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I???ll be there too.
>>> 
>>> So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself.  Anyone else?
>>> 
>>> Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then?  Say at noon?  Anyone that does not suit?
>>> 
>>> Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Femi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> 
>>>> I'll be there.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update.
>>>> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got it. I hope it can be a good input.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Hitoshi
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ===from here===
>>>> 
>>>> 3.2.  Questionnaire for Network Operators
>>>> 
>>>> Name: Takatoshi Ikeda
>>>> 
>>>> Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP
>>>> 
>>>> Contact Email: [e-mail]
>>>> 
>>>> Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?:
>>>> 
>>>> 3.2.1.  Deployment Status
>>>> 
>>>> Which of the following are currently deployed in your network?  And
>>>> for how long has it been deployed?
>>>> 
>>>> 1.  IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 2.  IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 3.  IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 4.  Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 5.  MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 6.  MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 7.  Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 3.2.2.  Deployment Specifics
>>>> 
>>>> 1.  Which IGMPv3 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
>>>>     list in use?)
>>>>      Membership-report for SSM
>>>>      No filter function is used.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2.  Which MLDv2 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
>>>>     list in use?)
>>>>      Membership-report for SSM
>>>>      No filter function is used.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 3.  Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between
>>>>     different IGMP versions?  (Between which IGMP versions?)  (What
>>>>     is your experience with this fallback mechanism?)
>>>> 
>>>>      No
>>>> 
>>>> 4.  Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor)
>>>>     implementations for your deployment?  (Have you encountered any
>>>>     inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst
>>>>     differing implementations?)  (What are your concerns about these
>>>>     issues?)
>>>> 
>>>>     No
>>>> 
>>>> 3.2.3.  Deployment Perspectives
>>>> 
>>>> 1.  What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
>>>>     Specifying Source for Multicast
>>>> 
>>>> 2.  What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
>>>>     None
>>>> 
>>>> 3.  What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to
>>>>     update these documents?
>>>> 
>>>> ===to here===
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not tried to
>>>>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Who else is coming ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Toerless
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Mankamana
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <[e-mail]> on behalf of Timothy Winters <[e-mail]>
>>>>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM
>>>>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=[e-mail]>
>>>>>> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm available Tuesday morning.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ~Tim
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>>>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to meet up?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any thoughts/feedback?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual mechanics of distributing the survey etc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Femi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> 
> -- 
> ---
> [e-mail]