Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?

Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> Tue, 23 July 2019 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <asaeda@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79DE12033C for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ieee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Yo13eLs3L_ig for <igmp-mld-bis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x835.google.com (mail-qt1-x835.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::835]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B036E1203BC for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x835.google.com with SMTP id a15so42318323qtn.7 for <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OzJKBxkHKs3ZurDTmi4koqToCK8uNVnUFL+qjF55MxM=; b=EieMwlkMYxC15WXvnmMkM7acIFDKIrqx+SzqFMFUuv0iLLS886Kh/onm0wGcdKY5sE uYwb8TO+aC5IGjwvsRkCXlCYxKhrDKgRbwbLauPfZdcB7+vUoGx5RCNS/BdgZ3zEkfd5 1Rja1MXELPjSa/z0pj+NKO0BOlulQY4jP7+tg=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=OzJKBxkHKs3ZurDTmi4koqToCK8uNVnUFL+qjF55MxM=; b=LI+YITu6+U+1WlkO/MLPkgJCVdZeI2BmkT0LqiHr8Jjxa4MUznA8uWSMl3lVWoCHOZ eVj5Y6ijoGVdJJ6isMbYChMiDYiV8TuSMO47kTfouTUczENPhf8sj6ZrqBS5BnCP31u3 EgRVJIeRfe2oVNZikRXj6WVV7QUUWjYM0+7+BpuxpDFBKV5urT6dJfDSA8Y51Otd4tUe eBz8DM2eMNakVFqvtY9i6RIX0BvcPyfmhPECvoLftOm3eSsieykj8Q07zMZD8EgOcrk5 vvRPf8x17k1CnDoGSamd2/jvhseYcX8ZNtapmSBMUXwNErz8taPDbJLoDMN0pNT7C5nL UlVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVkTjLzm7hXSGZTDnjYMa6r6YYUyfO7/Pqg80eZ9hd85zWITz+N uKM+HcXBIjQcpQaO7s3sGl8q3g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwk+CAI9XgxR8KFtMGY12JfLc+7nHKJBp78OR2cJ74/L0xnR0U4s/ZS5RSEPvXEaZKmOm8O1A==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4a10:: with SMTP id x16mr53805016qtq.282.1563895732723; Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:e948:e990:35d:e0f5? ([2001:67c:1232:144:e948:e990:35d:e0f5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11sm17624098qkn.26.2019.07.23.08.28.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2019 08:28:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190723152412.xls7ocfnwmlnvkj3@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:28:50 -0400
Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4F0C12E-A5B0-4014-ADE2-F61775241B91@ieee.org>
References: <F7E6E464-A65B-4920-91FA-52FE71F2FB87@arista.com> <CAOSSMjVLbQ2znHoMm6QC9sJLHM24ngDHZbp2cX_fxnA8fMJKGQ@mail.gmail.com> <F318396B-6553-48B5-A56B-EDA9A8E01B8D@cisco.com> <20190716195934.rty724quanksz2hp@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <F9B56DCD-5D7C-4DBA-BBD6-0A9C2039E34F@ieee.org> <4767384C-D17E-4E37-A264-CE783376F066@arista.com> <E46F8822-8F47-40DF-95D1-98BE7A956697@arista.com> <20190723152412.xls7ocfnwmlnvkj3@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/igmp-mld-bis/5M0ttmseyKiIHVaacCf6RDsf1BM>
Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
X-BeenThere: igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <igmp-mld-bis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/igmp-mld-bis/>
List-Post: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis>, <mailto:igmp-mld-bis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 15:28:57 -0000

Ah, sorry, I'm also booked another meeting this noon.
But whenever my meeting is over, I try to join.
Sorry about that.

Hitoshi

> On Jul 23, 2019, at 11:24, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?!
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote:
>> Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal?  If so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat?
>> 
>> I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to progress this work, hopefully this week.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Femi
>> 
>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I???ll be there too.
>>> 
>>> So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself.  Anyone else?
>>> 
>>> Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then?  Say at noon?  Anyone that does not suit?
>>> 
>>> Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Femi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>> 
>>>> I'll be there.
>>>> 
>>>> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update.
>>>> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got it. I hope it can be a good input.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> 
>>>> Hitoshi
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ===from here===
>>>> 
>>>> 3.2.  Questionnaire for Network Operators
>>>> 
>>>> Name: Takatoshi Ikeda
>>>> 
>>>> Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP
>>>> 
>>>> Contact Email: ops@jp.apan.net
>>>> 
>>>> Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?:
>>>> 
>>>> 3.2.1.  Deployment Status
>>>> 
>>>> Which of the following are currently deployed in your network?  And
>>>> for how long has it been deployed?
>>>> 
>>>> 1.  IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 2.  IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 3.  IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 4.  Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 5.  MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 6.  MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 7.  Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since:
>>>> 
>>>> 3.2.2.  Deployment Specifics
>>>> 
>>>> 1.  Which IGMPv3 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
>>>>     list in use?)
>>>>      Membership-report for SSM
>>>>      No filter function is used.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 2.  Which MLDv2 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
>>>>     list in use?)
>>>>      Membership-report for SSM
>>>>      No filter function is used.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 3.  Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between
>>>>     different IGMP versions?  (Between which IGMP versions?)  (What
>>>>     is your experience with this fallback mechanism?)
>>>> 
>>>>      No
>>>> 
>>>> 4.  Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor)
>>>>     implementations for your deployment?  (Have you encountered any
>>>>     inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst
>>>>     differing implementations?)  (What are your concerns about these
>>>>     issues?)
>>>> 
>>>>     No
>>>> 
>>>> 3.2.3.  Deployment Perspectives
>>>> 
>>>> 1.  What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
>>>>     Specifying Source for Multicast
>>>> 
>>>> 2.  What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
>>>>     None
>>>> 
>>>> 3.  What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to
>>>>     update these documents?
>>>> 
>>>> ===to here===
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not tried to
>>>>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Who else is coming ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Toerless
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Mankamana
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
>>>>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM
>>>>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
>>>>>> Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I'm available Tuesday morning.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ~Tim
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
>>>>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to meet up?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any thoughts/feedback?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual mechanics of distributing the survey etc.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Femi
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org<mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> ---
>>>>> tte@cs.fau.de
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> 
> -- 
> ---
> tte@cs.fau.de