Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?

Sounds good. Foyer = ground floor of hotel ?!

On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 09:46:27AM -0400, Olufemi Komolafe wrote:
> Does meeting at noon today still work for the folks in Montreal?  If so, shall we just meet in the foyer and we can grab a spot to chat?
> 
> I think our goal should be to try to ensure there???s nothing outstanding and finalise what we should tell the WG chairs to try to progress this work, hopefully this week.
> 
> Regards,
> Femi
> 
> > On 19 Jul 2019, at 07:45, Olufemi Komolafe <femi@arista.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I???ll be there too.
> > 
> > So I believe we have Tim, Toerless, Hitoshi and myself.  Anyone else?
> > 
> > Shall we try to meet on Tuesday, then?  Say at noon?  Anyone that does not suit?
> > 
> > Nice work getting a response to the survey, Hitoshi.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Femi
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >> On 19 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >> Hi folks,
> >> 
> >> I'll be there.
> >> 
> >> I'm sorry I've not contributed to this draft update.
> >> I'm not an operator and have no information privately, but I asked one Japanese operator to give some input based on the questionnaire and got it. I hope it can be a good input.
> >> 
> >> Regards,
> >> 
> >> Hitoshi
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ===from here===
> >> 
> >> 3.2.  Questionnaire for Network Operators
> >> 
> >>  Name: Takatoshi Ikeda
> >> 
> >>  Affiliation/Organization: APAN-JP
> >> 
> >>  Contact Email: ops@jp.apan.net
> >> 
> >>  Do you wish to keep your name and affiliation confidential?:
> >> 
> >> 3.2.1.  Deployment Status
> >> 
> >>  Which of the following are currently deployed in your network?  And
> >>  for how long has it been deployed?
> >> 
> >>  1.  IGMPv1 [RFC1112] deployed?: N, since:
> >> 
> >>  2.  IGMPv2 [RFC2236] deployed?: Y, since:
> >> 
> >>  3.  IGMPv3 [RFC3376] deployed?: Y, since:
> >> 
> >>  4.  Lightweight IGMPv3 [RFC5790] Implemented: N, since:
> >> 
> >>  5.  MLDv1 [RFC2710] deployed?: Y, since:
> >> 
> >>  6.  MLDv2 [RFC3810] deployed?: Y, since:
> >> 
> >>  7.  Lightweight MLDv2 [RFC5790] deployed?: N, since:
> >> 
> >> 3.2.2.  Deployment Specifics
> >> 
> >>  1.  Which IGMPv3 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
> >>      list in use?)
> >>       Membership-report for SSM
> >>       No filter function is used.
> >> 
> >> 
> >>  2.  Which MLDv2 features are in use?  (Is Exclude mode with source
> >>      list in use?)
> >>       Membership-report for SSM
> >>       No filter function is used.
> >> 
> >> 
> >>  3.  Does your network rely on the fallback mechanism between
> >>      different IGMP versions?  (Between which IGMP versions?)  (What
> >>      is your experience with this fallback mechanism?)
> >> 
> >>       No
> >> 
> >>  4.  Are you using equipment with different (multi-vendor)
> >>      implementations for your deployment?  (Have you encountered any
> >>      inter-operability or backward-compatibility issues amongst
> >>      differing implementations?)  (What are your concerns about these
> >>      issues?)
> >> 
> >>      No
> >> 
> >> 3.2.3.  Deployment Perspectives
> >> 
> >>  1.  What have you found to be the strengths of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
> >>      Specifying Source for Multicast
> >> 
> >>  2.  What have you found to be the weaknesses of IGMPv3/MLDv2?
> >>      None
> >> 
> >>  3.  What suggestions would you make to the PIM WG as it seeks to
> >>      update these documents?
> >> 
> >> ===to here===
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> On Jul 17, 2019, at 4:59, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> I hope i can go to IETF105 and would be happy to meet. Have not tried to
> >>> work out my schedule, but if i am there, it will be whole week.
> >>> 
> >>> Who else is coming ?
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers
> >>>  Toerless
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 07:07:55PM +0000, Mankamana Mishra (mankamis) wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> This IETF I would not be able to make it.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>> Mankamana
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> From: Igmp-mld-bis <igmp-mld-bis-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
> >>>> Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 12:06 PM
> >>>> To: Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> >>>> Cc: "igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org" <igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> >>>> Subject: Re: [Igmp-mld-bis] Meet in Montreal?
> >>>> 
> >>>> I'm available Tuesday morning.
> >>>> 
> >>>> ~Tim
> >>>> 
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:01 PM Olufemi Komolafe <femi=40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40arista.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> >>>> Not sure who is attending IETF 105 in Montreal next week but I was thinking that perhaps those of us attending can fix a time/place to meet up?
> >>>> 
> >>>> It might be an idea to meet on Monday or Tuesday, i.e. before the PIM WG meeting on Thursday, to try to progress and finalise the survey?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Also, there have been some discussions on the thread recently so it???d be good for folks to please take a look and provide any thoughts/feedback?
> >>>> 
> >>>> In my opinion, we should aim to handing over the survey to the WG chairs before the meeting so the focus can shift on to starting the actual mechanics of distributing the survey etc.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Femi
> >>>> 
> >>>> --
> >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org<mailto:Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org>
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> >>> 
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> ---
> >>> tte@cs.fau.de
> >>> 
> >>> -- 
> >>> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >>> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> >> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Igmp-mld-bis mailing list
> Igmp-mld-bis@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/igmp-mld-bis

-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de