Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 - 'OCB' and '802.11-OCB'

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Mon, 08 April 2019 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5571201C7; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0yaCtZbzv-XG; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 663AD1200B8; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 02:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x389bkil044460; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:37:46 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 85EE8203A96; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:37:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70055203972; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:37:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x389bkuX025949; Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:37:46 +0200
To: Pascal Thubert <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: int-dir@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, its@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb.all@ietf.org
References: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1f13ec3a-bfb2-8a7e-6e58-848a02a73e8c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:37:46 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <155169869045.5118.3508360720339540639@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/CLsG86TRWWK3SOAcpWxWB5OUAJs>
Subject: Re: [Int-dir] Intdir early review of draft-ietf-ipwave-ipv6-over-80211ocb-34 - 'OCB' and '802.11-OCB'
X-BeenThere: int-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is for discussion between the members of the Internet Area directorate." <int-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-dir/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-dir>, <mailto:int-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 09:37:52 -0000

Le 04/03/2019 à 12:24, Pascal Thubert a écrit :
> Reviewer: Pascal Thubert
> Review result: Not Ready
[...]
> Minor issues
> ---------------
> 
> "   OCB (outside the context of a basic service set - BSS): A mode of
>     operation in which a STA is not a member of a BSS and does not
>     utilize IEEE Std 802.11 authentication, association, or data
>     confidentiality.
> 
>     802.11-OCB: mode specified in IEEE Std 802.11-2016 when the MIB
>     attribute dot11OCBActivited is true.  Note: compliance with standards
>     and regulations set in different countries when using the 5.9GHz
>     frequency band is required.
> "
> 
> Are these 2 different things?

Yes, they are two different things.

We use the term 'OCB' in the text to write at high-level about the OCB 
mode.  For example, searching ' OCB ' (remark spaces surronding OCB) 
issues high-level text like:
 > The OCB operation is stripped off of all existing [blah blah blah]

On another hand, '802.11-OCB' is used in more specific text like:
 > A subnet is formed by the external 802.11-OCB interfaces of vehicles

I hope this use of two terms 'OCB' and '802.11-OCB' is not wrong in your 
reading.

Alex