IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-why64-00.txt]

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 09 January 2014 03:20 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9428C1AE0AB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:20:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b1HHZs4Pt9VG for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:20:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195901AE0A7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:19:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c10so14964898igq.4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:19:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9MUohmd5IrytueIZ0fmzY0dWm1ogV79fnnfMngUMKbY=; b=R1VBIvLcKniQ3IE/xnWjGhwnIn30cjzYNOOoPJsQArLDhwlB2ekz9P8pqpX8hqmfUP pVB8uiEX2WlMbNqnA9zAvHLcXriy+NM/I2ESVFNfS+SySW34y6LSkp2rByOzFpaToarj Y2vMi58Y0De+HbGNm1k9BZnHlmiJ5ze6hyjbSmpAYvWB9eiJb3frX0Kr2uUL9FQraDaU kZmTsmu39Vb4BUmF241P3bhL5GjJVYMpAOND1f46CKNSumiCiXvsUo8c2uJgOYnME/mI +Oq2Zal4a3Sp0hPsSfBnY8ckKE9594kFi4OPQN57PfSHNgU6GT5BzO/s60HGKVye6fA3 eT0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9MUohmd5IrytueIZ0fmzY0dWm1ogV79fnnfMngUMKbY=; b=UTiexjJCkcMs/vurL6NVgJ96mZ0SJtyD1FnXZUb8n2OTLPEp5/z4pBdGgvfqzgZDVH Et0qqWrQHYHp3gOkLeyUtARVp06o+XhZiDcwGvahNIXMgo50CFvUFHW/4YHQCSmiWOzz pZ/eExojIcfsPMbTwdLZWqiDZw67oNmzeXcGxMSMADsBwN+d4WWomqMdvS9Lxbev7YeY GLYZJcOcsCEvYP53p8HiaMQUGaZtMl/33E3gYwA1RMFbWBDxtn12ALim3cFNanXcFK1h zfEQCpZFPgZ/UrIlOrnriFq6n52DTdohZgwKE3kCH7pHLtYcODgYOi78VTa3pISj4Ia7 /m8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnV7JeNcUK0Fc2QHaDjpFDbBsNkzjUHII0OHFulztIoY4C3M9savSLPQomfVXzrokPShrKzJdZ1qQL6lMnAayM1rAhynAMUNFO19Xk5ObvZeg8d+INBPDJzx6uKX+JK64z+yu/oUHjXJQaW357kB/Wo9MGaUfGPGt646AJU77J4zFSbjJD3HQo/ZUiYMhoI2N9GOYEF
X-Received: by 10.50.176.137 with SMTP id ci9mr36141498igc.31.1389237590532; Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:19:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Jan 2014 19:19:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <52CE105E.4050102@gmail.com>
References: <52C9D788.8060606@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3-dxJgpKkcG3tqn-34g3rn=T2OiKgO8nYYUh9gB70zMQ@mail.gmail.com> <52CE105E.4050102@gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 12:19:30 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1Mgs3rMKd5t04zy8NUmf70yK0ymtXfDTO_Lhq7b-+r-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-why64-00.txt]
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0111e0da180fad04ef81154e"
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 03:20:01 -0000

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> > "For all unicast addresses, except those that start with the binary value
> > 000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long".
>
> Actually that (truncated) sentence is obsoleted by draft-ietf-6man-ug which
> is in the RFC queue. New version:
>
>    "For all unicast addresses, except those that start with the binary
>     value 000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long. If derived
>

... which is exactly the sentence I cited, right? I did look at
draft-ietf-6man-ug before I blurted out, you know :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email