IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-why64-00.txt]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 07 January 2014 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB581AE13B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:22:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2-U90AbcXQst for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:22:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22f.google.com (mail-pb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3581AE139 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:22:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id um1so524963pbc.6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:22:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ydJCd10H+0IwT+pZjqpXa0zMB7A83kWL+My3l6TYIpg=; b=BCAV8f4um6otnboBWr2aOVX98flY0H0dvMF7xJ0Z1/GK0sAqUpwx2zX8bywCNXvQ+k sglG3itdu2bk2OlRGYyHaap8kF3NcR0KIx6LKkzHIL2rrvSSrNQFSlGoyd0VpjYT/GzQ FIxUbJ9hMM8cJuYKSjWv6pJf6SQMyAHhGksnNS9gkYD8232b1iabVhCKUPjNBf2XEqu+ SOjv48oKj1I+y3Q7CPxQrydxBb1700H5p+b4X7HpoKL85PFaGOn7mQuBkoxWNEJ2Am6F LChpBFdeFolCSLYg4P5MLrtCMDn0D5PhlK4TFkKI76kijo/fmiLCuxjFPfGUNNTlFSN5 vQSQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.232.132 with SMTP id to4mr17596161pbc.141.1389122542739; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (217.194.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.194.217]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id jp3sm12946199pbc.36.2014.01.07.11.22.20 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52CC53F2.20802@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 08:22:26 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-carpenter-6man-why64-00.txt]
References: <52C9D788.8060606@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831818E598@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <52CBFF9D.5070301@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D98318190FC1@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <52CC3232.2030307@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D98318191143@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <52CC3D2E.8040005@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181911CF@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181911CF@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 19:22:33 -0000

On 08/01/2014 06:49, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> 
>>> ISATAP links are very real; the PHY is the underlying IPv4 site.
>> I don't doubt ISATAP links are real links which transport real packets.
>>
>> But a PHY would have a specific encoding scheme (OFDM, TDMA, etc.),
>> which IPV4 had not.
> 
> That doesn't matter. What matters is that ISATAP (like AERO) specifies
> the generation of IPv6 interface identifiers which are 64-bits in
> length - which is exactly the subject your document is addressing.

I agree with Fred. Actually for completeness we should list
RFC 2529 (6over4) too, although it is unused today as far as I know.

   Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email