IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Generic anycast addresses...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 30 May 2019 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2801D12019C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g14PWZvtfiQC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3F4B1201B4 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id a3so2453837pgb.3 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=3xoHkObDFDsow9MyWScA0MZF36FFmC0lDopNe8bxeKs=; b=qvmm+uYS4/rSCz5z0Jd2nMZwHFfxp8DgB5IcSSjUQAz0MTg3B1CKdPNjnnjQCYbTl4 vVlr7abKdWAHIzmCgx5Aay5m2UUWz3yyLXJ6wR10z/vfKSPyJAGz1uWTwnK5qLWaztd4 QYVekN+xFJU2Z/gBsN+CT/i5fESW1pBuc1xJ33WRl1eyIAgKcwKxhPCnNQQIgkY9MJo5 XPgmXxV1gGVnAAMbpED8GVe2078kcT1S/wTqELSf3u2RqS8jxrfpzCiNaugToF5P/2Lw czRgo3AL1Pt1APzGfqGds7V2Y1CKFj6sNGjvE7IuxPZ5uvd1dmjne3bH6TXY+JlWRaUr jDUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=3xoHkObDFDsow9MyWScA0MZF36FFmC0lDopNe8bxeKs=; b=AWnLfPxGyCKq2JqmpE+1lK9Oafiz9vpi8GnfeyoWmJbsPb7MJlk5T62nFJ8fJRH4Qk NKEtbqq9/eMrl0CzGKWhXyUMHewamFq7MlqxwXdIhpA+2J+NFbCHKZ+DzZloEUEdX56P vv7gSOizeArQ9R6iupWAenOTthdf42VKaKyUcefhyWYPUbutTe9BZt7KSGJYaTvhLNEH hFBTjpCQXAYqBecdLjus4e4CYpQg01FevReVHxu5x58JK2Lj21vV5eYwJ3KDdCulosBS QoBGAyHPSiVogQ42S7M7+neAXkqNk+S3my6WWKCZkWsa9569aXGVfegvTOETJ4XaIA8L dGTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU3Wu7cY+n2vMyOifdvT1N1kv4LyG7BfvStCM54pVY2hpiFC5C2 yqYh7ms921DlT/Hf91lC0twV2A==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyF0bYN8sMkVqbkrmkHuh84rmPtZJ9H+1YdBPX24nIGkSUDIQwWsuDd5M3ZYXPNwfkaaGAB4g==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:35c7:: with SMTP id c190mr4925951pfa.105.1559239031023; Thu, 30 May 2019 10:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [17.230.172.14] ([17.230.172.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 127sm3526164pfc.159.2019.05.30.10.57.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 30 May 2019 10:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <25253DD5-0820-4447-899C-9BF8DE0C3A60@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AEE5EDFC-C84E-458D-BEAA-5C8610E62664"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Generic anycast addresses...
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 10:57:08 -0700
In-Reply-To: <AA201EA5-5FE1-418A-A574-3A73ED305F47@gmail.com>
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <D22E680C-3EE3-4AD7-90C0-9339DA2E5A29@fugue.com> <BN6PR21MB04978DB375C05CB3CE4C914EA31F0@BN6PR21MB0497.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <4EF97F31-1F39-4150-B044-955C46E96FB4@fugue.com> <20190530002833.wfvjfbj2lv2ig664@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <AA201EA5-5FE1-418A-A574-3A73ED305F47@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/0CIwpZ7H0Od8drJ-4MDs7T_eS-I>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 17:57:13 -0000

On May 30, 2019, at 10:50 AM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> I second the observation. I'll add a bit: in anycast deployments for DNS, scope is handled using BGP, and is measured in policy hops, not router interfaces. My context here is that I am associated with ISC, which operates one of the DNS root services and is an anycast operation. [etc]

I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said here, but let’s not get side-tracked: you are talking about a totally different use case than the one I’m trying to address.   If somebody wants to try to address the use case you are talking about, I would greatly appreciate that not becoming an obstacle to progress on the use case I’m actually trying to address.

Thanks!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email