IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Generic anycast addresses...

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 30 May 2019 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B685C12006F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TNFpAf2s486M for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x431.google.com (mail-pf1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2973912003F for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x431.google.com with SMTP id u17so2751999pfn.7 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EBa+MvPugF2TqYqTEBbwTDIXJeN9CbeMUwaL91HC5qs=; b=T3Hcsq3gUoX3lFkB1FFUM7IZI782jCmW3kWuPOBiP3TS+kcl3DOOKWPp1p8Q/kSUcz 2a85efRmDmj6204TwlvhBn94AOxV7vFIhB9yxiqa48u8PE1hPUNT4z6rmB1LUEeHMgld dX7+oU3R2crUwXUSEmj03Yl0txto1kPf/AIYrGvTYuCLR+9y4MzxpjQePQJ9FBFxbo8y WikxbI2nwAx43KowqczBpGlab1heIwONDcKUp5fF7WPx6qX+wFJoKwXcHfysl4dxcPHa EdC1LnWi4B/b+8OG3cc1vi3SLT4MwXKRV0tijWINV7Q82tkcavWUE2UdkkQ9TuwmX60D uccQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=EBa+MvPugF2TqYqTEBbwTDIXJeN9CbeMUwaL91HC5qs=; b=QJEHsK1xeEMsSKc55IrL2rJ7D2Agn6xBb5J1XfY3cN9dCHMKlrvemrxdREGYSHhH/E Wv/hRRP9NyU8AE9UB/4gZqhGuPBvyNvLpgh6qQOM8ukZf0SaUpGa+4umROIV8/0HlLjS vXz+BzuySmEJK+WijNQIqg+02/e+5rQCIt6PawGzIJEd7CDlBQDQnNbMSrwhmkKZkrwn ti4DbvhqlIcx/cKeoLCwj0eCWqE+CjeD2D/B0UYT/FsnoDmvhvf6rB2IMy0ys1IwnleA 7C/HcCZJiyfQLSOE/V7CVs9JS8piYlHNNwlcq40eshXPw90BOFaGrim1FHLH9ldWuv7q xhYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUdlboye7sdh8BCPyo23E6QWf1kZf7/nwL4SziPtCSFyD205qUx KCtyTigQuKkErYcJIqTB1kalQK7+MYg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6cpMCwhnIAiw4f0nS52zty8n7P1RVIeEYYzEoyEy8gtPCpeHnRoH08lf6G8R8UX+zg1kabQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:2805:: with SMTP id o5mr599837pfo.256.1559176869584; Wed, 29 May 2019 17:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [17.230.171.24] ([17.230.171.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm993042pfj.17.2019.05.29.17.41.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 May 2019 17:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Generic anycast addresses...
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190530002833.wfvjfbj2lv2ig664@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 17:41:04 -0700
Cc: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A9560FC-0393-45DF-8389-B868455AC6DD@fugue.com>
References: <D22E680C-3EE3-4AD7-90C0-9339DA2E5A29@fugue.com> <BN6PR21MB04978DB375C05CB3CE4C914EA31F0@BN6PR21MB0497.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <4EF97F31-1F39-4150-B044-955C46E96FB4@fugue.com> <20190530002833.wfvjfbj2lv2ig664@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/MkHij5AseU_ePE-l5FRXhNFcE0o>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 00:41:13 -0000

Indeed, the propagation pattern of a ULA would work nicely for this, but there’s no way to do this automatically.   I might have (and indeed unfortunately it’s common to have) more than one ULA on a constrained network.   How do I pick?   :)

So what I really want is indeed something that is treated like a ULA, but that can be a constant, and not something that has to be derived.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email