IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Generic anycast addresses...

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 04 June 2019 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178661200F1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 23:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IacuAg3fmlaF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 23:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26C241200CE for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 23:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id E00AFAF; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:19:17 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1559629157; bh=Bltqt7w9gr1eMe3/qpZhPCxKiqQ1RxIefE4PoZOHKIM=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=yR9kYAJW941TkrJANS0JAb2Ytso8pAMZ+WKNX6oJCauGMjCB+pDc3cbww5qRvoPmA oH2JRpdgUg7ptAA8whWb2lk30Rcn83BWsnmn0/7BjwhlRlt4BiC7/v5ENgI38c6rSA 5wz9eVlOzIcDcRhZTpS3d4dQhAcaj+scLv0eB2jM=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA759F; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 08:19:17 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 08:19:17 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
cc: 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Generic anycast addresses...
In-Reply-To: <18416.1559587590@localhost>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1906040818250.19892@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <D22E680C-3EE3-4AD7-90C0-9339DA2E5A29@fugue.com> <7A9560FC-0393-45DF-8389-B868455AC6DD@fugue.com> <20190530005734.7d2alod2zoaemmhc@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <D6E27B45-437F-45BE-A305-47DD460BCE02@fugue.com> <26144.1559226966@localhost> <1DD451A7-D898-4105-974C-53776A3DA9F2@fugue.com> <20190530152902.l2nmyhadr4e4kt7x@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <0FF19D6D-1A45-41EF-BE34-CC35B5E51E1E@steffann.nl> <D91629F6-73AC-4A80-80EF-16644F73DA36@fugue.com> <701687d4-842c-6a16-3c97-349125324e3f@gmail.com> <D648647D-60E1-4DCE-B0BE-11002E0AE5A4@fugue.com> <25631.1559317738@localhost> <CAO42Z2x9iTrbvZuCxqSpDX-CQ9MtY8V1yyb-hg+XYtXXYn7LKg@mail.gmail.com> <9021.1559397908@localhost> <7cec7521-7e14-0eae-c166-2c727324dc5e@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2wwC5rjP91qG6nxsaj=0HBKPFzbOXdgGPiTT=pcDjW-+ w@mail.gmail.com> <20612.1559573730@localhost> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1906031703430.19 892@uplift.swm.pp.se> <18416.1559587590@localhost>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/0Dh7Ax66N6fPS0BUWOnfL6GyiA4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 06:19:23 -0000

On Mon, 3 Jun 2019, Michael Richardson wrote:

> I'm not sure.
> I have a /56 statically routed to me, but that was done before they could
> support PD.   I don't know why I have two different /64s delegated, and I've
> already asked about this.

"tcpdump -i pppoe -vvv port 546 or port 547". Send SIGUSR1 to odhcp6c to 
make it renew the lease, then you can check what's going on.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email