IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC6724-bis?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 23 September 2022 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3347C14CF12 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rp7lQaXKj6km for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:50:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc36.google.com (mail-oo1-xc36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186A5C14CF15 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc36.google.com with SMTP id c22-20020a4a4f16000000b00474a44441c8so1676737oob.7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=G/BqhGFWMhVxwT3z7MWginAyQPcL3yohdkPWJO9ah58=; b=in6TnC8yp3AEeVa3/IWF83973zdC78kvc0dHeNvM4Mk8IaljsvwcVlHixC4xI8RWHk SdvFF1MdSiCw/NjemY9GfEAChseD3GsidCylo51a2PWmreiHr5klYaND/WQYjwRJpm5h Ick/CsoTghVuC/FYPF4cg1C4VJfrC0/LSrTYRsKZ9NKf/WsFDItMSF1px4slBgieWR+w XBvIQIEcyjBiAOJbDBL2kGyJfk1N52nwFdgaSN+eJGuMpR3iHByDhkxM/jzURFu0f6UC RArjY5o0tUb4IrdzVgexaAkxNEwRGBSqDmoJv3KDlijpW95hqzbtxJHFGPEf3Cg2MWRx rDYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=G/BqhGFWMhVxwT3z7MWginAyQPcL3yohdkPWJO9ah58=; b=5SuLIjOJ4S61x8d70LvLcpCWDWjjOAuDnbylTRzPsfEFKOeuBTpAHbZ2o8Dm+nLpBj 0ZNXDDLQl9UcZBStbnMKSWlB+GQDy30dL+Hdrv6xROa2h0YNkHag+YIRWbDBh8TGlkx3 UsFGKuy++bv59dilY/7cD4D9csaa34m5o+xrUewBH6oz9PVO5eX/48Jl/YACqTe/nVA2 h2nA0IBQMazR4UkdPkmcmmOjcRmBcyK+jecognSflvhDfspRI4r0T0R6SvvHzXhDYgCp XsYggAu4K8zAIumq92fX/8bwebbtNtv5K/nHa0yBCW72f1wT8JEdEiwK5TvJZ98jxpjL EQfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf3QIoW89Dec2X8KYQ73zhU7k/6ZCGVjPXQy9SIfW/5dU2jtLpu5 bMVXD+xwRcy+CyMccyyNZgUSRwnldjEIb8uQZf6SVA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6HV+/GxB8H3tr5uB40X1Mi4DUxayij9ci79OU+4g45iA4huUZK12mnLd/AQQm19S3C3ouyapov4sW1lv7J3HI=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:434d:0:b0:441:9b4:ffad with SMTP id l13-20020a4a434d000000b0044109b4ffadmr2473229ooj.31.1663894234808; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <66892DC8-6DA4-4DC8-85B0-E1E1647CD9F7@gmail.com> <CAM5+tA9kttCKrZaoB7UzNdE6TU1qGNMaxDmWvFtRvpB4A8+WHA@mail.gmail.com> <8FE71499-D155-4853-A964-6617F6EA2069@gmail.com> <CAM5+tA9QuYxVs+NXBD3dAYr_Y=95bWt63WjmEMDOfegL0Z4otA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA_hg2sXXsYw6Tcx-ytRAMkKQcFw8a3N7SfEXwbuPm0LMw@mail.gmail.com> <00ea3b70-ba8e-b6ef-e1ce-fdd56828f506@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=_9Rwj-HnUZKWfatARbHWptArmSAV-qdi8MKyoBf9R0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xZ_-mDh66A9DK+3ieEqGMqW0Pt+mZzVOmzz4cDRUTEXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nqwMvVHvEGAx0jxgWhbW9ZUQfAZSDn-qRYQ0CDy-EGKQ@mail.gmail.com> <17a28c173ed640e68b1cbf504bbeae49@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1=xR_2Xw+1KL6vbzZ69N+vonhcTNvO=DBceeApfoS2bMQ@mail.gmail.com> <e76267b6101146cf8a1bd6fa567c6b77@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau2QO5sxevJwUbOj+_wyiCdOjnPEZM14Jhevvkq4YZqU7Q@mail.gmail.com> <bc85e623-ef89-d2e2-4e33-b8ce0a4ec343@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau0Wbki6xwcEdy8ZK-pO9jeT6+8TKZgbmXWUgnkR+dRhBg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau0Wbki6xwcEdy8ZK-pO9jeT6+8TKZgbmXWUgnkR+dRhBg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 20:50:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1=OmC+HNVGWbgj9JtGbpcuzKOgjZ1KXJm5mXgpji-G4Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC6724-bis?
To: David Farmer <farmer=40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cf5c9c05e94d90a0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/6kApSLh3tXz4LMysuDAhmMQQSYw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 00:50:37 -0000

Op do 22 sep. 2022 om 20:40 schreef David Farmer <farmer=
40umn.edu@dmarc.ietf.org>

> I think leaving unknown, most likely remote, ULA at a lower priority and
> adding the /48 or other known local ULA to the table at a higher priority
> automatically should help mitigate ULA in the public DNS and the possible
> response of turning off IPv6.
>
> In someways those that put ULA in the public DNS get what they deserve,
> I’m just worried about the remote user’s response to the brokenness,
> causing even more brokenness.
>

Hm, okay. I think we are all actually in agreement then, since I heard
Brian admitting earlier that it might be better to dynamically update the
table. I must have misunderstood what you meant by optimizing for the
uncommon case—sorry about that!

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email