IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC6724-bis?

Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net> Mon, 10 October 2022 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <buraglio@es.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BCEC1522B1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 04:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=es.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUVoT437YSbs for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 04:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52a.google.com (mail-ed1-x52a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ED5EC14CE22 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 04:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id u21so15476287edi.9 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 04:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=es.net; s=esnet-google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=yvUdw4ZpTbfvtN6mbb5NMNHEzFsgI+tbUgRBBSViDh0=; b=j5hDO696+S12Zzo84lUUVSKMGEyBRZNWzgCY56u3dlTOZ0NceCVZQ9rt4mD+H3mHDM XuQvSz7fVnR6gVXFl8XN0uFBlRydWyO1Lv82BAur4m+g5kes3VlrLZ3VFzgWwUhNTYd5 Ch5Pa78CMe22sSD/8zpOO6ZyExmdHskOwGYoiTBNiMi6ckr7OkIdeGYxrKb0mSGtU4CW MctRjYj13bZAY+FTGsAGpvzUDHfSgSLT81tJRNK736Fp6c19YWdM7wE4VTr6vHy98iV6 KsgWaSILRXRM13kulfqAlCIYmzzPxAJpl3dpAKjVuz7UEoIjcIXHKuiEeyZN+TkWKghY P1cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=yvUdw4ZpTbfvtN6mbb5NMNHEzFsgI+tbUgRBBSViDh0=; b=xq6w0mkoJS4twwZmP6aFuU5t4UTSZBQ0F/aYNhTvlhNcKDU1syRmMaZZxeDGVGKatv OGI/tjg9+HPldVRXr/wiBoo5jktNWqJ8P1YCyyCZRlO3eO8q6wE7ycDZU5fTLhT76csp ErjSjmNPZA6QtHWbHVPlvpjdVsptp6aSlELFcsVYLNKs7ALooYoj5938MaP3Dqcgmujq tb5KHMBerPwuj/fcfCGwci4S3kXRC2akpRVCbLcTuiB+U/9jJWxoHNfgT1OQvTXmUf78 2MTB5co27HqiN2aeziB48fTKbtFJLAQrZvAnPRSBfVccqyVZ9akefWYPgymVgch+FOC0 8D0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf12AD4Vq78FEZE7gNyf2R/0umqwvXvrotx6BiwdgRvU/oauRLps o+kwcxPGIkNbBFVeSoU6hPHAZiO77fJvBHX4IxrU7QZdxDwYMKQVHS4YB/N8y9NXMPVcYFBXG0I D7PAMzUxVfKniA8vxGKYWOao3OockUEt/Yi2kds2uXIEcDtpCKKX2wHbmOXcYA7W1LDdQUP6a
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5zfJoF4+3rj+AL4f29qzdDySsU/5T1laSiF08nvNHJU/XqUPlS4VAxvW8+rvqeYpKcSgEDUpxrA+VHVE4ESBQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:5291:b0:45c:3f6a:d4bc with SMTP id en17-20020a056402529100b0045c3f6ad4bcmr1749141edb.285.1665402170513; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 04:42:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <66892DC8-6DA4-4DC8-85B0-E1E1647CD9F7@gmail.com> <CAM5+tA9kttCKrZaoB7UzNdE6TU1qGNMaxDmWvFtRvpB4A8+WHA@mail.gmail.com> <8FE71499-D155-4853-A964-6617F6EA2069@gmail.com> <CAM5+tA9QuYxVs+NXBD3dAYr_Y=95bWt63WjmEMDOfegL0Z4otA@mail.gmail.com> <CAM5+tA_hg2sXXsYw6Tcx-ytRAMkKQcFw8a3N7SfEXwbuPm0LMw@mail.gmail.com> <00ea3b70-ba8e-b6ef-e1ce-fdd56828f506@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=_9Rwj-HnUZKWfatARbHWptArmSAV-qdi8MKyoBf9R0A@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xZ_-mDh66A9DK+3ieEqGMqW0Pt+mZzVOmzz4cDRUTEXA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nqwMvVHvEGAx0jxgWhbW9ZUQfAZSDn-qRYQ0CDy-EGKQ@mail.gmail.com> <17a28c173ed640e68b1cbf504bbeae49@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1=xR_2Xw+1KL6vbzZ69N+vonhcTNvO=DBceeApfoS2bMQ@mail.gmail.com> <e76267b6101146cf8a1bd6fa567c6b77@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau2QO5sxevJwUbOj+_wyiCdOjnPEZM14Jhevvkq4YZqU7Q@mail.gmail.com> <bc85e623-ef89-d2e2-4e33-b8ce0a4ec343@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau0Wbki6xwcEdy8ZK-pO9jeT6+8TKZgbmXWUgnkR+dRhBg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=OmC+HNVGWbgj9JtGbpcuzKOgjZ1KXJm5mXgpji-G4Mw@mail.gmail.com> <6edcc5d8-edf1-51de-103c-a4ac6060fef6@gmail.com> <29689d645d22409b962f6c361d71e098@huawei.com> <CAN-Dau3rwi4X4NqLbHMmPQQ=i7y23Kz70JK09ggsXSxkJfT5xA@mail.gmail.com> <bf7c7d74cc7744ef8ded7d043ceb3e5e@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1=dC6U2_7YO9PVgVVbBqPa3B==viZ_eQvAVTp_8PB2XSQ@mail.gmail.com> <652f259172c1460e82484f4e55c3eb72@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1kG6wS0fj-qs1=ZWiACvt_w8-_ShPv_1sMUsn_sXZqEbw@mail.gmail.com> <1f4bc5f6874f441f983be6320c935b5a@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1=8yCRN6_UVBTpveKrq0QO5=JNSGoEu0JHqxjqquVw+Ug@mail.gmail.com> <47cf506519b74148b07b46aff4e584cc@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1=mac4Ditm_dik9TcUp6MrBQzx1W2-NcDhS+1QKm4K80Q@mail.gmail.com> <80b7e1d6ebbc4207891b3fc7cd44b4eb@huawei.com> <CAPt1N1myZKLyxT-yJUAk1oLgb6gTuyU5Y0vu1hWxsm8ny805Hg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1myZKLyxT-yJUAk1oLgb6gTuyU5Y0vu1hWxsm8ny805Hg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: buraglio@es.net
From: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 06:42:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAM5+tA8+2-u_z4FgcTtE=TPb0cn6Yskh9Ddz4KGv9SvmLTcf5A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC6724-bis?
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Vasilenko Eduard <vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c8b47c05eaaca85c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/WHY85GUvxeMhVvbhYMH2g3qYkMg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 11:42:56 -0000

To close the loop, I think Ted has addressed the points very well. Using
gai.conf is the current method for adjustment, but it is largely
unavailable and difficult to scale (as noted in draft-ietf-v6ops-ula).

nb

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:03 AM Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 5:51 AM Vasilenko Eduard <
> vasilenko.eduard@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>> I have decided about 10 days ago to stop arguing about this point.
>>
>> The mail server fault has provoked it again (look at the message it was
>> sent 26th of September). I am sorry.
>>
>> D'oh! No worries, sorry for not noticing the date of transmission. :)
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
-- 
----
nb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email