Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 20 March 2024 02:08 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A19FC17C8A5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ar1Sf1-840IS for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08E2C1519AA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-690e2d194f6so42216486d6.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1710900517; x=1711505317; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HAprDZvVvBaQnqMBtevFY//ajjuICDGQoZVyJOkU/KE=; b=caCMTwwBTIoZKYt1P5D4w0c87bInwSGFNedkN2mo7VQp4wR/B8a58iTw6kZqBw9QoB 29vS7hcO8ycjoR5GYNHZx59PqKMlgdZ0YnJNEs/K28Zwt2ZA+hF+1abaq/XtE9XBwtqp LJFaTqhE37QSOyUl6n6a3+fxKdw7cm2S4NvFHd8OEzahiF1CVL6mD+LtEoObBdJ2Ovev +lsBJLKeKQ9swb/y3l0BlOT628feZ+qv7VX4lgJC/xhxNoK4m0c5AcceSJsqOg8h4bWz hxHbNgcOcNtfADjkpmrYFLHUbkTysz04vBxcchkw43cK8LGOPug7sm3CAIPaKWe1Bn76 njMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710900517; x=1711505317; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=HAprDZvVvBaQnqMBtevFY//ajjuICDGQoZVyJOkU/KE=; b=M/jtWKKsvhokHuHZvrJJGOpiFCLSYA2Xl4YBeUyafz+btYMDCYCT2OVIe3RLvFeeEZ Lxbrr4wbX1Q7gLBEymrLEu+q8u8BTVKKbZguzzF7AvGkV4G+TFirJ7U9WSF/FkRjhlxS eG3EZ0E8iJMILmX5JNUmfK7OtnBRW2HrJLazn7dxmwJw6+CbOf2GXvlvZwVClKFn7Exa 7/uuFW5bZfKk9j3B7oyw5vHMrcRnVGI/wy3w54QYPAqtyac0TbHiZqqurFLdRzLNbTyN L4TynXrJs2CHsQSTf7V+thZE9OSSC80gMmQ+Xlo49MxDvCBN2ODgwYk82JV3/8EKvRWu c5Zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwyvDYFrANF3XXtVJYMswnx1olcnG1+HwcOha/CS0QbWA9o1I5P 69Ru5D9cWIu5yqF2PMxC9UJD9jAlW18kiuliMZQfTeq7q4feWuiKrU/PgprVNCVg8PlpSW69Avd bhUA4dwg3jm5jr55qFHygb/yeP/tUzk7If6rF8Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFwL91UaQL7JCJIuQk5Z5ZIkXGvNW17OE7tQudbCtqjSFHJY5aZAHbcQ9/cMUJPmA0huG3VxkXyOxoFiweRIIY=
X-Received: by 2002:ad4:444d:0:b0:68e:fb17:e14b with SMTP id l13-20020ad4444d000000b0068efb17e14bmr4940128qvt.1.1710900516984; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 19:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <df333346-f108-3782-0ff5-4bd85d7b49ac@gmail.com> <015F13BE-32F7-4C8B-8C86-C9153FE9C9E9@employees.org> <CAPt1N1mr+YLQjHf6wKK__-K1-Rywtg0K03DpwZZRz6USHOKfhA@mail.gmail.com> <39de45b5-eca1-d627-dac2-abe47f2e7bca@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nwVSo=D9PXGAj9Hi5RUAK46aR_3P3kCLByDYXSN-UomA@mail.gmail.com> <645a37c1-6d3c-af54-e9ff-c743f07293b6@gmail.com> <CACMsEX-rXO6CWwmBy81AaAUBr7seZugVjVjUZSOxMia9VcnVpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nwoOa2PGMXYKh4GUxPCdonjV_5ymRdaDH3fxg34EmBww@mail.gmail.com> <CACMsEX9tfwvhKyxu52k2VYai8K3eN4wOMwetX60FW427d4s8Mg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1km9BY+8LS7=9V6O1bRJHkKkHWL2EV5T0PmSkAbF-4g0A@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR15MB48111989259021237D4FA6E5A6332@CO1PR15MB4811.namprd15.prod.outlook.com> <CAPt1N1m+Z0Km1M1hOg2sVYpAoQX0bv-1UmE8Sp3EfxZ=WjNTPg@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR15MB4811B7E1109B2EC543DB20CEA6332@CO1PR15MB4811.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR15MB4811B7E1109B2EC543DB20CEA6332@CO1PR15MB4811.namprd15.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:08:26 +1000
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1mCrCyAe7HBDQxFUyC=BNsszbRn9STTXVNC4U9xxdPwAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: IPv6 <ipv6@jima.us>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008fb17406140e111b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/ImQ8_9yCl2lJJ_E3IysmBtkALVg>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 02:08:40 -0000
I would appreciate it if we could discuss the merits and not the marketability of this proposal. When the IETF publishes a standards-track or informational document, we are indeed recommending the documented solution. It’s fine for you to disagree with me, but as a general principle IETF consensus should be based on technical arguments, not marketing arguments. Of course we want whatever we recommend to be something the market would use, but we don’t need to solve a problem simply because the market would buy the solution to the problem. There should be an actual problem to solve that is not already solved by an existing standard. That’s not the case here. Op wo 20 mrt 2024 om 11:04 schreef IPv6 <ipv6@jima.us> > Ted, > > I don't think standardization is necessarily the implicit (or explicit?) > endorsement that you're suggesting it is. > > Some vendors already offer more or less the functionality in question; > some network operators will implement this whether or not there's a > Standards-track RFC outlining it (assuming they're not already). Not having > an official-ish RFC just means they might do it more poorly. > > Or they'll just do N:1 NAT/PAT/"NAT overload." > > Or they'll just announce provider-independent space from every site (this > would be a different kind of bad). > > Or they'll just continue to not adopt IPv6, because it can't do the things > to which they're accustomed on IPv4. > > Technical purity aside, I'd rather have the least-bad option for the > internet at large. > > - Jima > > ________________________________________ > From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 7:43 PM > To: IPv6 <ipv6@jima.us> > Cc: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>; IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org > > > Subject: Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis > > Is that a use case that the IETF would recommend in a standards-track > document, though? This is my point: it's not wrong to document this. What > I'm suggesting is that we shouldn't standardize it. We should not, e.g., > have 7084-bis recommending it. Or anything else. > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:34 AM IPv6 <mailto:ipv6@jima.us> wrote: > Lack of imagination (or maybe cursed knowledge) doesn't mean it only > solves a single problem. ;-) > > It also solves something of an edge case where a leaf site is numbered off > of a core site's static address space, but needs selective local internet > break-out for bandwidth-intensive workloads (which aren't desired to be > backhauled through the core site). > > (Sorry if it sounds niche; I didn't invent this construct. -_- ) > > - Jima > ________________________________________ > From: ipv6 <mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Ted Lemon <mailto: > mellon@fugue.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 19:19 > To: Nick Buraglio <mailto:buraglio@forwardingplane.net> > Cc: IPv6 List <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:32 PM Nick Buraglio <mailto:mailto: > buraglio@forwardingplane.net> wrote: > Agreed, happiness should not determine success. From what I have seen > (which is admittedly limited) moving from experimental to a "higher level" > RFC is typically accompanied by something like a deployment status > document, e.g. the SRv6 deployment status doc here > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status > > I think it's really important to distinguish between "this draft solves a > problem" and "this draft solves a problem that can't be solved already" and > "this experiment has succeed and we can promote the document to > informational or standards-track." > > I think we can all agree that this draft solves a problem. I think it > solves exactly one problem: allowing sites to keep stable internal > addressing in the face of renumbering by ISPs and/or changing ISPs. > > However, this problem can be addressed the way 7084 currently solves it: > by numbering the internal network with a stable ULA and hosting services on > addresses within that ULA rather than on a temporary GUA provided by the > ISP. > > Problems NPTV6 does not solve: > > * MHMP (although it solves some aspects) > * Internal address privacy > > So I don't actually think this document does anything useful for the > Internet community. I don't mind that there is a document that describes > NPTv6, but I don't think it should be standards track or informational, and > I don't think IETF documents should normatively reference it. > > Regarding experiments, at least from a scientific perspective, an > experiment needs to have a control group. If we wanted to know whether > NPTv6 solved the problem in an easier way than dual ULA/GUA, we would want > to set up an experiment where some sites continued to use IPv4, some used > NPTv6, and some used ULA/GUA. As far as I know, no such experiment has been > done, and no such comparison has been documented. > > I think the presentation Paulo has just done is the most interesting, but > what we are not seeing is an answer to the question "how's it going, what > problems do you have, etc." >
- [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-… Bob Hinden
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Bob Hinden
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ed Horley
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Jeremy Duncan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Costello, Tom
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… IPv6
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Neil Hanlon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… jordi.palet@consulintel.es
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Bob Hinden
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tom Coffeen
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Dale W. Carder
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Naoki Matsuhira
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Naoki Matsuhira
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Simon Hobson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Philip Homburg
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… jordi.palet@consulintel.es
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Philip Homburg
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Timothy Winters
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Philip Homburg
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- Re: [IPv6] signaling NPTv6 (was Re: Adoption call… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Philip Homburg
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Philip Homburg
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Erik Kline
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Jima
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ed Horley
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Naoki Matsuhira
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Philip Homburg
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Naoki Matsuhira
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Naoki Matsuhira
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… David Lamparter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Naoki Matsuhira
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Philip Homburg
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] signaling NPTv6 (was Re: Adoption call… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] signaling NPTv6 (was Re: Adoption call… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Jima
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Mark Smith
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… IPv6
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] signaling NPTv6 (was Re: Adoption call… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… David Lamparter
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ackermann, Michael
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption call fo… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] First hop selection [was: Adoption cal… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Jima
- Re: [IPv6] External address discovery (Was: Adopt… mohamed.boucadair
- [IPv6] Conclusion of Adoption call for draft-bctb… Bob Hinden
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Naoki Matsuhira
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ole Trøan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… mohamed.boucadair
- [IPv6] External address discovery (Was: Adoption … Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Philip Homburg
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… IPv6
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Conclusion of Adoption call for draft-… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Tim Chown
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- [IPv6] signaling NPTv6 (was Re: Adoption call for… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] Conclusion of Adoption call for draft-… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Michael Richardson
- Re: [IPv6] External address discovery (Was: Adopt… Ole Troan
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Jima
- Re: [IPv6] External address discovery (Was: Adopt… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Ted Lemon
- Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6… Nick Buraglio