IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Sun, 24 March 2024 06:11 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DCBC14F684 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bY9fo0W5Ks9R for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x532.google.com (mail-ed1-x532.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::532]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1228C14F617 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x532.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-56c0be2d69dso25959a12.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:11:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1711260694; x=1711865494; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0r8hoVuy/fBNzgFGITznZkw94tlawpKbBDrUgajhEaM=; b=VBXje0a/n9SW2+LEgsH+RXZfohztaWmGEk3yjv2Fq9YVwbWXw46oKA3ZX0VsigGQPK L9EhnENuxtLi5U+yKDimxwNkBIkGPWM5z3r+yjKMylRBE/q4bqZlZdtq1zsuzieHW5e4 ShZxRbo45rQJE8CsEOXDApr+JuK0C6LUbyen6Dyxl8/c6fgSJuDZE6Her0pvTPIYKu/W 8OVZrt9ya0n4sxdSsDZyfh2pZSC4i/LM4pfMibN0qJ3B+L7wdZTKe3aJPf3jZ75YNebb lPYv7ySqzxKsDWh969SLY4ee8j5AxXCZKNssITVjhU/Pz6PUsSogHLXRJWzzdMFByQwM G9NQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711260694; x=1711865494; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=0r8hoVuy/fBNzgFGITznZkw94tlawpKbBDrUgajhEaM=; b=tH33VfjxrYp3Wxsnyh4HK7qjQZx/5Y3hVDWNoNhCb1Z0P/OfyJcoZxs8184WmZskmx L4sGytWeqKBho4QttBd+ZjRz/WXJMEzwcocbnRUhrWVd/Vw7I4czpEmXJEIQZ75Si0hP 0HzvWIU/oSYxzMr5ozyQ5c4sg8kw2db2jfIQwdMOuAbSu0+LojUTdZTdTp6DFmeSeHVv kANq1s8gudqh5NBV5EBamYHDp6ncCPcsD3U8W+HnMRDnjU2uhuxwp7vR+LlBKZzEU+ji jkiwKKnzqALPuI/U2ZwEXrDa+rJPMfLlYnZJYHMRPzVXAGQVqoVr6UWgUg7blmaPfUtz 8JHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzDAkYj7bgAWFCLSzwssYdkQXhXidXpkq7sMFTQ83KZujKTsFAv Da6rr4TgL7JO0eKwqi+FFalGBhDrpfu2u9wEH4jOjDBZFKZMuhjVy7P8rm1BpQbi7kQX7ztA5AZ 4zwJDccBAGYR8a8klcYLjAq/XGLXMvnrI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHfBnFjTPI6WNxRmYU3AtFy4egcOzmnpZIX7aybzQf0WwE6YYQvbYHGN0ZovmEVZM2ucf6S/ZYhFddKL6nAu80=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:950e:0:b0:56b:a852:74b7 with SMTP id u14-20020a50950e000000b0056ba85274b7mr3197150eda.6.1711260693895; Sat, 23 Mar 2024 23:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPt1N1mOyG2jrLcK3Gc47_i-XkbVPY=GweTMWNKOK7O00BpaFg@mail.gmail.com> <04BB59E2-D7DD-4409-A5AB-17321FA8E061@employees.org> <CAO42Z2yqemkhJx3Kpdx0_tg4f07XV6auJo5X8LOy93fQNK0A8w@mail.gmail.com> <F784AA41-36FB-4ACC-BCA8-982A3469DEC6@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <F784AA41-36FB-4ACC-BCA8-982A3469DEC6@employees.org>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 17:11:23 +1100
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2wi7subN0hqLqeWXPSeHj7Y9ewfP-y=rnXAbFEAUfx+EA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c72688061461edd0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/izpLw1dsnUWghJ-QrLOB5Z7hcqI>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 06:11:39 -0000

Hi Ole,

On Sat, 23 Mar 2024, 17:22 Ole Troan, <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> Mark,
>
> >
> > Tailscale VPN
>
> Yes, that one is interesting to explore.
> We have a wireguard implementation in VPP, pretty sure that doesn’t deal
> with all these intricacies out of the box at least.
>
> Am I the only one who see the irony of the application taking advantage of
> IPv6 end-to-end only to use it to build an even more end to end transparent
> overlay? :-)
>

One perspective I've had on the use of UDP encapsulations, e.g. QUIC, is
that it trying to get back more transparency for IPv4 hosts and
applications.

https://blog.apnic.net/2017/03/24/udp-ipv4-stepping-stone-ipv6/

Regards,
Mark.



> O.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email