IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 27 March 2024 01:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3872FC14F5ED for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.609
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.609 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A7xqryOxvSpe for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x630.google.com (mail-ej1-x630.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::630]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD184C14F5E3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x630.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a2f22bfb4e6so811496166b.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1711503084; x=1712107884; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=b1msa5z97Hp5qQP/xpUahQSBZ2Wuc5c92YuGmS405TI=; b=dfZHwxdQM0njYssynw4NBlxhWQq3cpkiHODWJxlws6PDj4tL2c9jdJlJCpeNlCwuvl +LXEoylM0+Bq/zXZCthQKwRGnmqY8HYqpeivTQuwGOBY/u8wqCvY72jj7t+E115dxJtK YQMvthFJIevV1SUMRLCqiOiEj7wV94JJjWlkEyfYMGJxJmJ1r15O5swC0C/3VOVJPBGe ctRzGPf3uoTk6gNgNFMIPBHT1qukDUR/JS2oQDID6YR+nZOdA6Y7FbjLhz8cLYy7s0tR S4bu27D0OT2lFreixTIVWB2haFtj8CYR60jrZitJv0AC/HT+KOC0SqL4aSAxDvHymb0P 1hTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1711503084; x=1712107884; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=b1msa5z97Hp5qQP/xpUahQSBZ2Wuc5c92YuGmS405TI=; b=TbEuJ3Gmy6ZcjzyiRMF5v4gz479r9+eciFigyyGecVg0SFPk3PJmRQpOJuX9ZWUXCG 5JkrOZcwhoQ0tjEZ6obTXuUMrXeA0rOV3sPk3KWM1SqyGeiddTtnigcKcrTvH6iZEAPy sShJK/KOHkiwnl5wICprCdUNlY/Y39V6LsVpeK+tp1CHTcrR8YNR8xIkzpbS2F51TRgi Qa1m91ZG+c8UU65ju8GcJPrmBAQcg82XTPoRMfygSxs6QXPiUXkQB9n3hebcwU+xyQCo JDie986Ry5/b3nP7Kcm3zMsauxM2sXq4ZXPt0itUaIPbGi1eGvOhd0ymKTumheDKPFTy Qd0A==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW9XwjgmUGLWn7XmivZ5kj7DoufRTarXZwf6UFBhhiOf89mYI/mm0mpBOg+BU/y/0zbhAlENE2NmUz7fdB0
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwRJl9rmvfnVLZf+0ii+d+k/r/FKimZ4TIVcUQTFsOs4FjQZkKc RVtnat/EuaCb9SX1JbHwrC1fUXEA1EDUl+r42SnbdDQlRN4Z7qH+aPoJfefVDYm8TRAmJeDHDQv CqTx8unEwgSnzNmiQs/k6EQOQwPiE4gKixQda
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH+9ia4KtS/CCH8fZ+6+CnZZr3khJL9/uyufqD/tr/DR+LVAgkd8T1ZSnoMg1P1WEO413jWVB6RcbrPSE/fEjU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7892:b0:a46:c8d5:84c8 with SMTP id ku18-20020a170907789200b00a46c8d584c8mr7440051ejc.38.1711503084340; Tue, 26 Mar 2024 18:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADmxuPF1AReQCSY13HjqXE+8Jofy_uoo1wmnzs8+whG7Tdc+UQ@mail.gmail.com> <836E3A12-FAAF-4C19-91A1-322203645AAA@employees.org> <CADmxuPEBXYeTPrJqfPEGaxmUM75iKQx6kfCcpHHjxyekZy0xuQ@mail.gmail.com> <2DB6E450-9EE4-438A-9D3B-78DDFF0CA78F@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <2DB6E450-9EE4-438A-9D3B-78DDFF0CA78F@employees.org>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 10:31:09 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0+ArFfn7uZddMAGpxYroSxw-u=cpti4mwp_7-yRBSRSA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Cc: Naoki Matsuhira <matsuhira.ietf@gmail.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006023cf06149a5de9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/xyEXChWCmnURvITBpK7PezuH41U>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2024 01:31:31 -0000

On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 6:33 PM Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:

> The benefit of NAT class mechanisms, is that cost and benefit are aligned.
> Only one side needs to deploy it.
>

Actually, the benefit of NAT class mechanisms is that *one party deploys
them and another party incurs the costs*. NAT is great for the network
operator, because it moves a number of problems out of the network
operator's domain. But it doesn't do that by solving the problem, it does
so by making the application's job more difficult.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email