IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 21 March 2024 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FF0C15152D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nlpoUJ5dbqFn for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (proxmox01.kjsl.com [204.87.183.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA89C15108E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from proxmox01.kjsl.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4F8DAE2005; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=employees.org; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type :date:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=prox2023; bh=uOQg0sjbQwBhr5NJ uC59zfv4cGcrga+CPlYMnhUf8WU=; b=Y+hmagH6za7Rgf6ADX/0TIVQajD7Xir5 HL6OUX07cM7aeug8jyUWy8ZZ93ZpEdtI4Wi2yWhOdgmXTRSajaEz2DAd1cUAU7SX bbi1h2QZ4dId3Q69oLBZcVVC+E3la2Kfba0wvWAtOgfrcfvxT0+s1wIamJoLMIyh xqVk8tyc28IXS7T0qSEe24Zj2JJsh/lGhDNcG1Vp4YNPGEINf25gcbODPF00/4P4 ZT0nVZXOgX60Z0eKqb0Skzqo7An5bUyvcIpR7XgrrerUgZLkYx9bQnBMAD7MYf+F CSPWcOdnGJz4asALxEelU2XaekpZUzHlfWxWGukk8a/fk6MqNidImg==
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by proxmox01.kjsl.com (Proxmox) with ESMTPS id 2F71EE1FF9; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2001:4650:c3ed:37a:ad10:a5fe:5ebc:7ab1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71AE84E11ACC; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:30:26 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1hYYV37zzAQ7Y7dxeSNkS3pzB917HjwejNcBjqMdn8+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:30:13 +0100
Cc: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@forwardingplane.net>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E7C513B0-3A40-45E6-AC23-04A94D7B8D55@employees.org>
References: <CAPt1N1nUtBrh0dam7rCm-Tx4hGy4VJbH16c6r+bQTfV0EgaMBg@mail.gmail.com> <82FF5551-9665-4F1B-988D-125016F90E83@employees.org> <CAPt1N1=5Er9bbdO1tYBZTkem7f2=YDEJgGB-zN8AFcL7z9+QAg@mail.gmail.com> <79A6B56E-FC2B-498A-A54D-D1301CE56B94@employees.org> <CAPt1N1=eFFOkuJShykJn1_BZuY3BAGTgza=a7Hnp4JKZetxiCA@mail.gmail.com> <71BE78C4-17B9-4454-91CA-3F3132826688@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr3bjHXB36MJe0NjjXf5tsMFd52q_Ln9+R_oWS1gt3Kxgw@mail.gmail.com> <1aaf99f5-d600-2e13-26b7-48f1ecd73d48@gmail.com> <2A798A60-1934-488B-8FA8-E6E68AE95EE9@consulintel.es> <167231.1710925950@dyas> <CACMsEX8gFbkBbGMokWaQfVvcUrDr+=0aOTLNPxSTzpbDh_Vjvw@mail.gmail.com> <42AB74D4-49DC-4FD4-A182-11D901D13C4E@jisc.ac.uk> <CACMsEX-qja5GbRu+od3kXYPYAJm=bEqXDUq6A9AvDP999LXXsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1hYYV37zzAQ7Y7dxeSNkS3pzB917HjwejNcBjqMdn8+Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Jl5dVIQww-3DiMj3mfdh8gRPVEQ>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Adoption call for draft-bctb-6man-rfc6296-bis
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:30:31 -0000

> >
> > For whom? Network operators?  Home users?  Application developers?
> [...]
>  via https://www.ietf.org/standards/process/informational-vs-experimental/
> 
> FWIW I suspect the reason it's experimental is not because it was an experiment. It's that there would have been no consensus to publish it as anything else.

+1.

O.

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status