IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com> Sun, 12 November 2017 02:25 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F22D128C83; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:25:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXLcWrYeteO4; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:25:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x234.google.com (mail-pf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F323F124BFA; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i5so9415351pfe.6; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:25:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=CfT0fSufUljpj4TbcM6qnQpUVKXl8/nIx/HDXk5iwdg=; b=YATiVGE1GTUAUlr3wnMYoCBYL6bz3hiLRa2A9kIUKlFn2788TM+STnxdHQHAd4KDko UMY9Nt3UHpLDKqcHXsOZrZzRQMkKqFOOY5aquFZRR5+P6zIwIztDzX/hjmpNI5HvQAxZ ytlszB7bVupuM5y6GA528Y3oNZ6Bu/uuIm7JKg3xbASgiOKCgAl6SVhecBDicDrG60kt jCba+DerZpEr0z1p7k11mWSe3GB2+LZT4ZudWuNVShP/ro3ZkvBp9H/dMkwiKe7m/V+/ GLYg+m8R2UnzsXgTntHmOnJMeqjmjMmRPd8LcvRUCFNU51NUL+c/h6K5Pvo5AQmuweky kxKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=CfT0fSufUljpj4TbcM6qnQpUVKXl8/nIx/HDXk5iwdg=; b=FdQ8IXiXWYuF+x0GqOa51TtWAHQqrRAx/jbA92see+0feOIq1OnGSISV9KPgErM2gN uGKJ9DIX9FmOqZMoypSc4kxfNubzAQ5J4PBGDeQ2lSgP8HUSsx3EHS+0eVSXdDiXc8vd 8UruGz04UguJRDtgLw756bIIJiKeHIrRpoK8whqlROHGGrb2W1IuazDJj/zmd9669NXJ 7wNUu8jdM1BBHQIX5vUwenMfg+nf/qTvbdikh/bJ0ClHGfBy9LDZZl0Wymy+jBE1ymNq l+ntTXNjmi3Hjh1WPJ2AvYh5HPd5mf1i3Kd0mpZD0o/eXDJ7mkp0McTvJ4hRl2GXRoOe Khng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4/FNBWbxjvIRSQZbWecbLTZS0LxDPsJITNLuxuAHR8ELt4DP5B wDFk8nDBcq8F8UfK38WGDXs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZX/48dzcOw3kVbJLzZl0j7SoD3YX0tZDCydCABGraJD2JLZ1WM4mmu+5M5UAnLUD4GlfwnYg==
X-Received: by 10.101.77.3 with SMTP id i3mr4782529pgt.311.1510453518543; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [59.29.43.171] ([59.29.43.171]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b6sm20183526pgc.2.2017.11.11.18.25.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Nov 2017 18:25:15 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
From: DY Kim <dykim6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e3c690ee-b0b0-07a0-46ec-1ed92f29a7d5@si6networks.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 11:25:12 +0900
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8F6B656B-BD9B-4F23-B534-88AD685EE7EB@gmail.com>
References: <be9724f5-2ff5-d90c-2749-ecae2c628b78@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0_a2Qm8U4oK+BQU57DeDUD9i-o_+G+YhnH4pVXRxmxxQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d154133-a1de-7774-1589-c7069bf279ee@si6networks.com> <0b45890d-ea4a-47b8-a650-ceb72b066df8@gmail.com> <ea772bfd-4004-7f94-8469-b50e3aff0f29@si6networks.com> <F2330138-6842-4C38-B5A0-FB40BFACD038@employees.org> <e40697ca-8017-c9d2-c25d-89087046c9cf@gmail.com> <e3c690ee-b0b0-07a0-46ec-1ed92f29a7d5@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/SfrBfKkQ26q5XiPXNxEWtHeLgwo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 02:25:20 -0000

I’m not sure whether setting L=0 guarantees node isolation:

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861#section-4.6.2

 “L    … When not set the advertisement makes no statement about on-link or off-link properties of the prefix. In other words, if the L flag is not set a host MUST NOT conclude that an address derived from the prefix is off-link.  That is, it MUST NOT update a previous indication that the address is on-link.”

That is, with refreshing L=0 for the same prefix, the previous on-link property of the prefix continues to be valid.

---
DY

> On 12 Nov 2017, at 10:49, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> And if the goal is just to isolate
> nodes, set L=0 in the RAs, and so be it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email