IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-grand : saving lookups

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Mon, 10 August 2020 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B103A1529; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KXZlv0HsX8PL; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 222A03A0C3A; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id z18so8470544wrm.12; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=1lDwlFigZTAF5RCcGes0DeUp1ZsD7rysGzG+9ynatsI=; b=UNJMWgHWPnXiJ9EPcnbKYt2C4uYZ6sJ8Xyaaqgl7mHO8mIOIgK7mb5AZxivrDyZZU0 nbR4bkMEW1Om7DxWCXXUI0j5teV0RuT/KTfhZ07fno/7E35KY72mVFPRkBhwc3kgTouo 4iPDra2oFWGzX3vJfQzNtyOV+5bYTqWQtwPJCIGPAOpWzj8WDFYE0QFUImJxkQjs/SsN E5SaUtUo6Btl1uatwEl4uSrlId2AQ4Du7whI56PrFGJZRJikGtZpDcn+Y0O/BMEAHYEC MolbvjmYudKfsxDXwpXExmH0+6wV+staN8fFC/tNqOoe1Fa1MKEDF8y7YeoMSPGw3bJg g/ng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=1lDwlFigZTAF5RCcGes0DeUp1ZsD7rysGzG+9ynatsI=; b=N1u2FIFdAKTfDuJcICuLaEq+HRw70J+wm0hWva2JcFGCMfJpMHYlCbTFUwaeY1gXfy JgDaLMEsr2vkohT0libNf7A92TgflL/zMaliveFat2QdnipVsyZu0VouhOyb0AV0wjmt 1gqIYCL9EqwBiHkpqY61jSBH6kZ951wt9I8oERsZXzIpcKBX+uG9wlXcXaZWYOsIkl4g QxtexnN+FoeOK+4E5cOQk9OkA01cvgvhV4ve51FBt4G9Not/dNkGjw1kie/dnM0nNIUr y1ofXX3Req0iLkyhQkFNv4yUd+EC8wsJhQ9hL3pQmM9Aih5ujPlz0fzq6Gpifx0d9Szy T5ZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336TOZGNnniwJguFVu2JkcTe5CgIMCSQnWftsFUHEz7j7IkxVZQ 1VmSLKFJGBNuLjHNsVD7HLm/DSuxWHI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+Ot03Z43HsMIGQvRpPZXHwljUAMaU7pqEuRFHNkRrscuGXeLXxA3V+LpJWRPefBzUShs+SQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:42c2:: with SMTP id t2mr25039038wrr.396.1597071511487; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.199] (c-24-5-53-184.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.5.53.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c194sm22112846wme.8.2020.08.10.07.58.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:58:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3D71C5A6-D7FD-45B1-B43C-5526D3A6E55C@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_19ECF757-FE36-44B9-A318-05DABFCE4C8A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-6man-grand : saving lookups
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 07:58:25 -0700
In-Reply-To: <89a4f4fc-7f4a-52c5-83b9-bd112f7a831a@foobar.org>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
References: <m1k4nX7-0000ICC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <1D1A68AE-4C75-4DF0-8C7C-3500DB67C8FB@fugue.com> <4B1A43D0-45B1-4C73-8B09-089D4EC1FFF7@cisco.com> <17A8FA06-3776-450A-B549-958157AD5784@gmail.com> <B50732C5-4BBA-49E4-A169-74677C91B88B@cisco.com> <0A2FD466-6DB0-4378-88B7-AB99D32C2180@gmail.com> <89a4f4fc-7f4a-52c5-83b9-bd112f7a831a@foobar.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/wPOwVhX3hAlrPCbyNYIfRr0VEic>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:58:35 -0000

Nick,

> On Aug 10, 2020, at 2:36 AM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> Bob Hinden wrote on 10/08/2020 00:42:
>> I thought we learned long ago to not create large distributed broadcast/multicast domains.
> 
> We did, but what's disheartening is that people persistently use this model as rationale to justify a protocol change of one form or another.
> 
> Maybe we need an ID which states this explicitly: "Large broadcast domains considered harmful"?  As long as we have broadcast domains, people will be tempted to make them too large and will express surprise that they don't scale well.

I agree on both points.   I would be willing to help write such a draft, but think it would be better with authors who have direct operational experience.

Bob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email