Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@juniper.net> Wed, 08 August 2012 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6266511E808D for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.375
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.224, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s+nnFyPy4ONo for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og109.obsmtp.com (exprod7og109.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F7011E8087 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob109.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUCL1sh4SEuqO5WQCot3UWgMWTgix9BgU@postini.com; Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:26:43 PDT
Received: from P-CLDFE01-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:25:58 -0700
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by p-cldfe01-hq.jnpr.net (172.24.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.355.2; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 16:25:58 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:25:56 -0400
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@juniper.net>
To: Lin Han <Lin.Han@huawei.com>, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>, Lenny Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@juniper.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:21:58 -0400
Thread-Topic: IRS comments
Thread-Index: Ac11vSi9vbTm3ZyNSu+JXzxURySWzA==
Message-ID: <CC486C90.32BD%tnadeau@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <1D30AF33624CDD4A99E8C395069A2A161FE0FDBC@dfweml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 23:26:46 -0000

On 8/8/12 7:14 PM, "Lin Han" <Lin.Han@huawei.com>; wrote:

>Similar confusion by wisely avoidance -:)
>
>If possible, Someone can draw a simple picture of IRS location in a
>router with existence of other components.

	Did you see the slides that Alia sent out from the IETF Presentation?
Unicast me if not and I will get them to you.

>Also, I think people are confused by the comparison with SDN and OF. More
>clarification will be helpful.

	For that, we really should set up some internal tech talk thing. Slides
can help, but having a decent presentation on this would go a long way.
Let me see what we can do in this regard.

	--Tom


>
>Lin 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org]
>On Behalf Of Gert Grammel
>Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 6:41 PM
>To: Thomas Nadeau; Lenny Giuliano; Alia Atlas
>Cc: irs-discuss@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments
>
>Tom,
>
>It is confusing to understand whether IRS belongs to a new network
>management plane or if it's more of a control plane extension. The draft
>wisely avoids this classification.
>To me IRS appears to be a completely different beast which should best be
> characterized as 'Network Programming Plane' NPP.
>It neither aims to do full provisioning (as a management plane would do)
>nor aims to replace routing (as a control plane would do).
>Hence we better name the baby NPP -- thereby avoiding any linkage to
>taxation.
>
>
>Gert
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org <irs-discuss-bounces@ietf.org>;
>To: Lenny Giuliano; Alia Atlas
>Cc: irs-discuss@ietf.org <irs-discuss@ietf.org>;
>Sent: Tue Jul 31 01:50:40 2012
>Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments
>
>
>[Re-adding IRS]
>
>	Thank you for reviewing and the comments. We will incorporate the edits
>in the next rev.
>
>	--Tom
>
>
>On 7/30/12 5:04 PM, "Lenny Giuliano" <lenny@juniper.net>; wrote:
>
>>
>>Minor points:
>>
>>-section 4, para 2, 3rd sentence, "Howeve,r"
>>
>>-4.1.3 "There is no bidirectional programmatic interface to add, modify,
>>    remove or read state from the multicast RIB."
>> 	-How is this unique to mcast?  Couldn't you say the same thing
>> 	about unicast?
>>
>>-4.1.3 "The multicast state added need not match to well-known protocol
>>    installed state.  For instance, traffic received on an specified set,
>>    or all, interfaces that is destined to a particular prefix from all
>>    sources or a particular prefix could be subject to the specified
>>    replication."
>> 	-Not clear to me at all what this para is saying.
>>
>>-"IRS"- you may want to select a different acronym that isn't related to
>>something as unpopular as taxation (something we learned with AMT).
>>Maybe 
>>RSI instead...
>>
>>Overall, I found the doc to be clearly written and straightforward.
>>Sounds like Openflow for routers.  Not sure if it's intentional that you
>>didn't mention Openflow, but it did seem like an elephant in the room as
>>I 
>>was reading thru.  Also, I did wonder what was new and novel here, as
>>this 
>>sounded like our SDK which has been around for years.
>>
>>
>>-Lenny
>
>_______________________________________________
>irs-discuss mailing list
>irs-discuss@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>_______________________________________________
>irs-discuss mailing list
>irs-discuss@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss