Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments
Edward Crabbe <edc@google.com> Thu, 30 August 2012 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <edc@google.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925FD21F8534 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:59:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.357
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.357 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.381, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kKN3dGetHT4d for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67AB21F8532 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ieak13 with SMTP id k13so1195720iea.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; bh=cLFlryD0kGoP3DGKiF9hJwnZsIq1ehdcKKI0jltqyPs=; b=IGchjmqCRLOWCCTp5Iji8lAZQSrMrepa5+/IgYBwtdbzMbkqYKuDPZQzC8eRRMhQIh Ipvfxr4E1Nc1+1S3hNzSlMEzo314QXC8Syj1x7sdEeG7V2KVziWguBL7mubeMC3ZfXh+ 42H1eNd3YnFVkoe5CAmymn+wP2F39P6XOhEwwyBBy2vjmAhSS3DyFe/iORDBm47af+gy PgDx1GZAQAn7XZxSS0EEXjhoS4KfGk4ZzZmmZP7akeZKprFZfv+z9rmmkvWGkj3dnRcj 1qtaf7/tpWCTAHlMsgykSqiQ4zOsHw6XXmajOY4X0C0z1/cgTDUnj9z/pXuFxVfxOLZ8 p3OA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state; bh=cLFlryD0kGoP3DGKiF9hJwnZsIq1ehdcKKI0jltqyPs=; b=hlbtzny+5tenPZWjvB1iLErc8MwaDPSTaJ2dmIsz2XoLe/ju4/BhGodGzQEU7MJVBM bUX77hY50IJSsdwdZQLebQnif1WaClvPOS1ugO1JiBDOV3uMs3Z+z/rroCpIu4iaWj6D 38umrjufn2ZoK4SnH3GbzDBKyI9LIIVzbzNgNhG+ROGOybA7t58EEWP1GSCyNi9YAAGO m7y58q+58NME/HsgEQwEFEZJmbHDDPhzUzYE/z2mA7TQpT7Jo2WBy6I+mLUla3IfFZO0 AWyBBFxpveV/Ato08Fgm34Z7rwXw7Ad4DFeg1KGq8SxL7uDHSv76v53tJx254Z/Vel6G /EQQ==
Received: by 10.50.13.200 with SMTP id j8mr1875559igc.48.1346353175170; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:59:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.13.200 with SMTP id j8mr1875534igc.48.1346353174986; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:59:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.237.67 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rfEkxAu_XbeVN_76mw+=-Rm45-eveuKMWbeXBTuktrj_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <812700A304640D4292205D5E83FC59E1061C211D@p-embx01-eq.jnpr.net> <CAG=JvvjYk_E6+Qdidyyjc5oDss9HeA2aq2pt5ciQeX06fuiWsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1reLL2_4KRb6yseJK9WTB47YzumMBGdu+UwcOWXxmE0M8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAG=JvvjVhGsVcSzEFxDKKfNckQxgQiWeezWvwpcoAOSgOP--Nw@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rd_p6x_+PsHWtsYU=oOCT-GnmnZNL+MHcJf4NEG5boP7A@mail.gmail.com> <B37E6A2CE5957F4E83C1D9845A0FFE38014A33BC4A@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com> <CAG4d1reWGjUU-z=9Gx_MvetAWF6wM8oUMpQRc9hxOg1MU37X_w@mail.gmail.com> <A3C4E51A53661B4EBEE7C5F5E6FCDEB5025AB94FE6D2@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com> <CAG4d1rfD8_0WgzRqH-OVAxfn1RYNfY_ynwkcmqN3MBYyrn5TnQ@mail.gmail.com> <3512BB31280C39448A9880F61DD54CEB09C07E@xmb-aln-x09.cisco.com> <CAG4d1rcvk1RmRmrpCwiAGx9s0v3X9aPECdeF1Wz7WSuYwzdFKA@mail.gmail.com> <CACKN6JH8eiYty3QOZ+E5Nt0wO3nYn87yB3pKixJK-3dnaOXfLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACKN6JFMZqOnHU=vEkx8WxwSLjg5MYY=-VoJ7uOt8SAzvbAT6Q@mail.gmail.com> <A3C4E51A53661B4EBEE7C5F5E6FCDEB5025AB94FE847@USEXCHANGE.corp.extremenetworks.com> <B37E6A2CE5957F4E83C1D9845A0FFE38014A33C0A0@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com> <CAG4d1rehfWk-HX27eysze8zdDzjNk4h4wwj2zV6_WJWxoNxY8Q@mail.gmail.com> <B37E6A2CE5957F4E83C1D9845A0FFE38014A33C26F@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com> <B17A6910EEDD1F45980687268941550FB7B7B6@MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com> <B37E6A2CE5957F4E83C1D9845A0FFE38014A33C2BD@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com> <C584046466ED224CA92C1BC3313B963E09F22C5413@INBANSXCHMBSA3.in.alcatel-lucent.com> <B37E6A2CE5957F4E83C1D9845A0FFE38014A33C554@MDWEXGMB02.ciena.com> <C584046466ED224CA92C1BC3313B963E09F22C55F2@INBANSXCHMBSA3.in.alcatel-lucent.com> <CAG4d1rfEkxAu_XbeVN_76mw+=-Rm45-eveuKMWbeXBTuktrj_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Edward Crabbe <edc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:58:54 -0700
Message-ID: <CACKN6JFNHSM=Tu=tPCUe7zWm1g9LRfa6Bv9kvr+uoriVhmLhBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d04462d6cbcc14604c88046b0"
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJdg6nAzR2tnJYFzy1S6FhbkxSIsIg65SZKnR0L6i/+hBSMnFiiACPtN7d+FXaE+SYouuidoo8jHc9zB4Pe5dhYoxL+oJE/f/J95pUc/5wQXs9HG5XfgQJCZlJegm5/ROprKOHe0WwivGV6bME64xdU3rFkdhsvqj/nWYMJ+oQ8HtOKL6Rgl8wt48vYJ4LQNdUp2Od
Cc: "UTTARO, JAMES" <ju1738@att.com>, "Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)" <pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com>, "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>, "irs-discuss@ietf.org" <irs-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:59:36 -0000
Alia; If there is a) a mechanism for installing routes, pbr or otherwise, which recurse to directly connected nexthops b) a mechanism for gathering topological information then you've inherently enabled centralized spf. On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote: > I haven't seen a good description of what is intended or desired by > moving the SPF functionality to a centralized location. Clearly such > centralization can have a very bad impact on convergence - which is a > strong motivator for simultaneously computing fast-reroute > alternatives (with guaranteed coverage ala MRT) and installing both. > > I don't see IRS as having a way of "turning off" the SPF computation > in the IGP; a different lobotomized IGP protocol/process would be > needed. > > Alia > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal) > <pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote: > > "LSDB (I saw an email which talks about reducing IGP to link > >> distribution protocol and running SPF in centralized network > >> controller)" > > > > I have seen discussions in the past on this and in fact I didn't get > precisely what is meant. If anybody in the list could brief very > > precisely that would help a lot. > > > > Here is my understanding - the routers would do LSA/LSP flooding for > OSPF/ISIS as it is done today. So routers would build neighboring > relationship/adjacencies to participate in flooding and each router builds > its LSDB. > > > > Then the IRS "application" would track LSDB changes and pull up the > "diffs" from each router (thru "controller") whenever there is a change. > The application would compute SPF on behalf of each router (LSDB). The > result of the compute would be pushed by application to each Router (thru > controller) and inject entries into RIB. > > > > Is that correct? How different this going to be from PCE? > > > > If this is correct then perhaps we would like to ask what are the > scalability numbers in LSDB we are talking about? > > > > The "application" would be running in a high performance server and so > SPF compute there is not an issue and perhaps it is good way to synchronize > FIB update (to a certain extent) to avoid u-loops etc. > > > > But when we are managing all routers in the purview of the application, > the computing power in each router is not uniform. To be realistic, I have > some concerns on how much "real-timeness" we could achieve between > application and controllers on such proposals, esp. when scaling numbers > are high. This leads to higher time lag on inconsistency between > application SPF compute and FIB update. It's almost like the classic "slow > peering" issues with TCP like protocols - the high performance peer is > slowed down by low performance peer. > > > > Static route interface is good thing because it is a state that persists > longer. > > > > IGPs may be deployed in very dynamic environments where tight coupling > is desirable between SPF compute and FIB update. In scaled environments the > issue is less about SPF compute time and is more about synchronizing the > FIB. > > > > Running on-demand CSPF by IRS application may be fine because of > persistency of RSVP-TE tunnels in dynamic environments. > > > > I apologize if I misunderstood the intent. > > > > Thanks, > > Pranjal > > ---snip--- > _______________________________________________ > irs-discuss mailing list > irs-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss >
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Gert Grammel
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Gert Grammel
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Lin Han
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Lin Han
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Lin Han
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Susan Hares
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Robert Raszuk
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Gert Grammel
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Scott Whyte
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Susan Hares
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Gert Grammel
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Scott Whyte
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Olen Stokes
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments David Lake (dlake)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments David Lake (dlake)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Olen Stokes
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments David Lake (dlake)
- Re: [irs-discuss] 答复: 答复: IRS comments Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Olen Stokes
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Robert Raszuk
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments UTTARO, JAMES
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Lin Han
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Ramon Casellas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- [irs-discuss] 答复: IRS comments Mach Chen
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] 答复: IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- [irs-discuss] 答复: 答复: IRS comments Mach Chen
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] 答复: 答复: IRS comments Alia Atlas
- [irs-discuss] 答复: 答复: 答复: IRS comments Mach Chen
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] 答复: 答复: IRS comments Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Acee Lindem
- Re: [irs-discuss] 答复: 答复: IRS comments Susan Hares
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Edward Crabbe
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Alia Atlas
- Re: [irs-discuss] IRS comments Thomas Nadeau