IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

"William Zayas" <william.zayas@fibercrossing.net> Thu, 23 August 2012 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <william.zayas@fibercrossing.net>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB0821F85B8 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.739
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VEVUjoFtM1Ym for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (omr13.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.63]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7203521F857A for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cm-omr10 (mail.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.50]) by omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7NHAaJN024802 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:10:36 -0400
Authentication-Results: cm-omr10 smtp.user=william.zayas@fibercrossing.net; auth=pass (LOGIN)
X-Authenticated-UID: william.zayas@fibercrossing.net
Received: from [76.110.101.202] ([76.110.101.202:3302] helo=your3b7c6e1c8e) by cm-omr10 (envelope-from <william.zayas@fibercrossing.net>) (ecelerity 2.2.2.41 r(31179/31189)) with ESMTPA id F7/C6-26049-C0466305; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:10:36 -0400
Message-ID: <9A5F76118A2A46D9B181A0C2FAD5B689@your3b7c6e1c8e>
From: William Zayas <william.zayas@fibercrossing.net>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, l2vpn@ietf.org
References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:10:35 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Zayas <william.zayas@fibercrossing.net>
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:10:38 -0000

Support..:)


William




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com>
To: <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:03 PM
Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support


This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06

should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the 
room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make 
decisions :)

Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in 
Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me 
asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.

Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th 
with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.

Giles

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email