IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

"Xiangyang (Victor) Zhang" <xizhang@juniper.net> Fri, 24 August 2012 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <xizhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1360021F86C2 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YiBPP4mJD+hT for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com (exprod7og104.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E5121F86B9 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUDeusnTgXXP4vnsVOcSwhVtC2GP3b2D4@postini.com; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:25 PDT
Received: from EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::c821:7c81:f21f:8bc7]) by P-EMHUB01-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::fc92:eb1:759:2c72%11]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:21 -0700
From: "Xiangyang (Victor) Zhang" <xizhang@juniper.net>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:41:20 -0700
Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Index: Ac2BSOrOrKhC1qwCTzW+FpYGh6zNJQAzkRsQ
Message-ID: <5E893DB832F57341992548CDBB333163A63248A041@EMBX01-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:41:26 -0000

Support.

Regards,

Victor

-----Original Message-----
From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:04 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06

should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make decisions :)

Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.

Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.

Giles

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email