RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

"Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)" <pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 24 August 2012 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F0D21F861F for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.894, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qLJOrQ18X7hx for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2C221F8564 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inbansmailrelay2.in.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-250-11-33.lucent.com [135.250.11.33]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q7O0G3Y4003709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 19:16:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from INBANSXCHHUB03.in.alcatel-lucent.com (inbansxchhub03.in.alcatel-lucent.com [135.250.12.80]) by inbansmailrelay2.in.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q7O0G2bj023823 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:46:03 +0530
Received: from INBANSXCHMBSA3.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.50]) by INBANSXCHHUB03.in.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.250.12.80]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:46:02 +0530
From: "Dutta, Pranjal K (Pranjal)" <pranjal.dutta@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 05:46:01 +0530
Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Index: Ac2BSOySqFnTH9rqRUuMvg0pvRsQCAARLB0Q
Message-ID: <C584046466ED224CA92C1BC3313B963E09F2382B37@INBANSXCHMBSA3.in.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:16:09 -0000

Support.

Thanks,
Pranjal

-----Original Message-----
From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 9:04 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06

should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make decisions :)

Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.

Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.

Giles