IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

<Manuel.Paul@telekom.de> Fri, 24 August 2012 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Manuel.Paul@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9B921F8668 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ETTTKmH2wBzU for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail83.telekom.de (tcmail83.telekom.de [62.225.183.131]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8A421F8667 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:03:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he101251.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.154]) by tcmail81.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 24 Aug 2012 09:03:49 +0200
Received: from HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.148]) by HE101251.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::e428:2144:dcc5:bcce%15]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:03:47 +0200
From: Manuel.Paul@telekom.de
To: giles.heron@gmail.com, l2vpn@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 09:03:47 +0200
Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Index: Ac2BSO/+3JxfeMBTQ8SIrG7j0Y90UQAB91+g
Message-ID: <9435EDACD941174099E143BCA2BCD615FAC4C615E8@HE101452.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:03:57 -0000

Support!
(as a co-author)

Thanks
Manuel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Giles Heron
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 6:04 PM
> To: l2vpn@ietf.org
> Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
>
> This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06
>
> should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
>
> We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the
> room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make
> decisions :)
>
> Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in
> Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email
> me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.
>
> Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th
> with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.
>
> Giles

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email