IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

Jounay Frédéric <Frederic.Jounay@orange.ch> Fri, 24 August 2012 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Frederic.Jounay@orange.ch>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237F721F86C3 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xz0W7KAyPM4z for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp10.eds.ch (smtp10.eds.ch [195.160.148.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255C721F8613 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c3a09427-b7f556d000001bcb-c6-50376853c46e
Received: from chcrochs054.orange.ch (Unknown_Domain [204.104.149.84]) (using TLS with cipher RC4-MD5 (RC4-MD5/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp10.eds.ch () with SMTP id DF.68.07115.35867305; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:41:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from CHCROCHC051.orange.ch ([fe80:0000:0000:0000:704b:3a68:12.14.247.83]) by chcrochs054.orange.ch ([172.19.166.54]) with mapi; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:41:07 +0200
From: Jounay Frédéric <Frederic.Jounay@orange.ch>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 13:41:06 +0200
Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Index: Ac2BUjy/QdVeNWUuTwaI2Gcj9chquwAmwqDA
Message-ID: <78046FD1C8FE0345AFBC11640A8DF6E2017F387F4901@CHCROCHC051.orange.ch>
References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com> <9A5F76118A2A46D9B181A0C2FAD5B689@your3b7c6e1c8e>
In-Reply-To: <9A5F76118A2A46D9B181A0C2FAD5B689@your3b7c6e1c8e>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVyJmNqiG5whnmAwaKllhZPj85gtHj87RC7 A5PHzll32T2WLPnJFMAUxWWTkpqTWZZapG+XwJUxd+ZPxoJj7BUnZ61jbGBsYuti5OSQEDCR aNkwjwXCFpO4cG89UJyDQ0ighUnicWIXIxeQuZZR4taZ6ewgNWwCbhJLrkxlArFFBLwkbv6/ xwhiswioSny79hjMFhZwkmhZ8JkdosZZ4lLzBBaQmSICRhKtk9xAwrwCARKz964HWyskUCCx 4swkMJtTwE7ixe8tYKcxAp3z/dQasFXMAuISt57MZ4I4U0BiyZ7zzBC2qMTLx/9YIepFJe60 r2eEqNeTuDF1ChuErS2xbOFrZoi9ghInZz5hmcAoOgvJ2FlIWmYhaZmFpGUBI8sqRt7i3JIC QwO91JRiveSMTYzAmDi8YIr6DsbpF8wPMQpwMCrx8B7oNgsQYk0sK67MPcQowcGsJMIr4Gce IMSbklhZlVqUH19UmpNafIhRmoNFSZz3ZDBfgJBAemJJanZqakFqEUyWiYNTqoGRL1KH814f f9KeCLd+n419e3ZISq5NfPvj9bUJSnVZZSn5UX3loqpTNS5O2DRt+uQTCnUW5ixvk1LtVvn/ VYu/9u4bf3dr0+HOIpG1GctuWvQemHDptYbc7lf36oP4l3B/+6LqHmBWapN2p7J/z2KFxaIH ey6d32CxL7pfa/OSTbcX9fJwc/5VYinOSDTUYi4qTgQAu0zsjoUCAAA=
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:41:10 -0000

Hi,

Support (as co-author)

Fred

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Giles Heron" <giles.heron@gmail.com>
To: <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2012 12:03 PM
Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support


This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06

should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the 
room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make 
decisions :)

Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in 
Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me 
asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.

Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th 
with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.

Giles

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email