IETF Logo Mail Archive

答复: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com> Thu, 30 August 2012 08:57 UTC

Return-Path: <haoweiguo@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0261721F8567 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:57:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.788
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.788 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4j4x8aYaefh3 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE1921F8566 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id AKE06433; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:56:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) by lhreml204-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.7.223) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:56:26 +0100
Received: from SZXEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.59) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:56:57 +0100
Received: from SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.129]) by szxeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 16:55:23 +0800
From: Haoweiguo <haoweiguo@huawei.com>
To: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: 答复: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Index: AQHNgUkRowlL7sR6z0asFP3FQyh6P5dxilyAgACNXFQ=
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:55:22 +0000
Message-ID: <DD5FC8DE455C3348B94340C0AB5517332C0784A6@SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>, <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D077992FD@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D077992FD@szxeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.22.156]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:57:01 -0000

support
Regards
Weiguo

________________________________________
发件人: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Lizhenbin [lizhenbin@huawei.com]
发送时间: 2012年8月30日 16:29
到: Giles Heron; l2vpn@ietf.org
主题: 答复: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

Support


-----邮件原件-----
发件人: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Giles Heron
发送时间: 2012年8月24日 0:04
收件人: l2vpn@ietf.org
主题: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06

should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make decisions :)

Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.

Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.

Giles

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email