RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

"Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> Thu, 23 August 2012 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F2621F8611 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.701, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I+za4OGjm27J for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6187421F85FC for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q7NG9uCM023965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:11:09 +0200
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.41]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:10:46 +0200
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:10:44 +0200
Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Index: Ac2BSPTL+EsNSIVBSXKwyLzKpYvayQAAOD8g
Message-ID: <14C7F4F06DB5814AB0DE29716C4F6D6702E186FB21@FRMRSSXCHMBSB1.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: nl-NL, en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:11:20 -0000

Support as co-author

-----Original Message-----
From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Giles Heron
Sent: donderdag 23 augustus 2012 18:04
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06

should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make decisions :)

Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.

Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.

Giles