WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> Thu, 23 August 2012 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <giles.heron@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB98D21F84B2 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.425
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.425 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.175, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKJMsNwKsJ0N for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F67221F8602 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eaai11 with SMTP id i11so276995eaa.31 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :cc:to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=1vaVRzjgpCFBgBItVhJ1nuVpbAFQGxKlaMv+Mk1g86M=; b=zsZAoeK6dG4zGzn2S1vdhBsxUF1JUWQaUu8joXPkzNAfYRoV0lEKAlkyXMaUiR6gjE XUlVRObeFOAKUr4+jvJsGCeBbA8roVeDlFSzEHQrJ7FVSTBSUve6qYU6zDGvo6MsNkAl O5KrYG6zeI2zz5GN9J+5ySjMZsF+LZUhsZS8SUA7DDfWuLXuhZIGWATYWC4mkCoW5LXx YiOYT1tw8MBusOjxyNPoVfzi4QWVY00+b3ZPgRB0eoGZVQrrJ0vp6LT2e+fWgy7TpPTM pCuCBp4juONcGV7Z9TArWo9DuyIr7Q+GAElyCENy/Kxe834oYyHruLGNWvzwO7TgvXsK YYuQ==
Received: by 10.14.224.4 with SMTP id w4mr2722277eep.21.1345737839135; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp4591.cisco.com (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 45sm22591491eed.17.2012.08.23.09.03.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:03:44 +0100
Message-Id: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:04:00 -0000

This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06

should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.

We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make decisions :)

Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.

Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.

Giles