答复: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Fri, 24 August 2012 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B2C21F86B7 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.833, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, CN_BODY_35=0.339, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVhj8DFsLoS3 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dfwrgout.huawei.com (dfwrgout.huawei.com [206.16.17.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9961F21F86B1 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:37:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.9.243 (EHLO dfwdlp03-ep.huawei.com) ([172.18.9.243]) by dfwrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.5-GA FastPath) with ESMTP id AJV00270; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:37:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:32:14 -0700
Received: from SZXEML437-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.72.61.72) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 00:32:12 -0700
Received: from SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.129]) by szxeml437-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.72.61.72]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:32:06 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: 答复: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Topic: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Thread-Index: AQHNgUj5odqd/j5Pg064Ry+GjT/RVJdoknqQ
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:32:05 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE22CA7C5B8@SZXEML511-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4C315ACB-5B01-4B20-B622-179665B787D9@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.96.190]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:37:14 -0000

Support.

Best regards,
Mach

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Giles
> Heron
> 发送时间: 2012年8月24日 0:04
> 收件人: l2vpn@ietf.org
> 主题: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
> 
> This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06
> 
> should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
> 
> We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of the
> room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we make
> decisions :)
> 
> Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in
> Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me
> asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.
> 
> Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with
> comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.
> 
> Giles