IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lisp] LISP EID Block Size

"Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com> Mon, 04 November 2013 00:30 UTC

Return-Path: <darlewis@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lisp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE4E21E80A3 for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 16:30:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YKVr+UVZFTTQ for <lisp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 16:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1B411E8256 for <lisp@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 16:30:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=857; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1383525045; x=1384734645; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=SweH6MMdf7sqhceSmYpK7slm7tBPB6C67uRwtZr7nA8=; b=HItiLVxbFQLNQMRf1xdqzgElEnDnUfvZtkjIIwEoWS5tGoOEP8zS2060 OqMZ0mGZj6adFaTBN7I6LFUj8W0XWykRZ4DZEhbAl/og9L4kI+BtGKtZn wOZe1S8NssB1q1nvSncXjVHOWDkxbQdLroKMRJ+hBULJjd10pKN6ZSp8+ g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgkFAFvqdlKtJV2Y/2dsb2JhbABZgweBC79PgRoWdIIlAQEBAwF5EAIBCA4KLjIlAgQOBYd7Br1PjyUzB4MggQ4DmAqSCYMmgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,628,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="280156636"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2013 00:30:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rA40Ui8J026907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Nov 2013 00:30:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.5.54]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Sun, 3 Nov 2013 18:30:44 -0600
From: "Darrel Lewis (darlewis)" <darlewis@cisco.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
Thread-Topic: [lisp] LISP EID Block Size
Thread-Index: AQHO2PUZC5Jl8rx8B0O7KJbwOz1stw==
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 00:30:44 +0000
Message-ID: <2BEFEBB6-AD3F-4493-8628-21F273D3CAB2@cisco.com>
References: <20131030154454.587D918C143@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <15CC7F54-075E-4EB8-940B-8DCB198134A2@apnic.net> <E6AD700C-DC48-48DB-9FF5-A24C6121834C@gmail.com> <D68CD130-50BC-42AE-95E5-A4EBEEB20808@apnic.net> <8119249a5b4cb0604726fa7560538cf3@bartschnet.de> <FBB83D5B-E5C1-493E-8FAD-2AF489759CBF@steffann.nl> <82F5CF42-2E3A-444A-8449-39B01C0B2C3B@gigix.net> <3C9E1CFD-642E-4590-92BB-E1E5F65F8B02@steffann.nl> <92D11F1F-CED7-4A98-B45F-FD91727624FE@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <92D11F1F-CED7-4A98-B45F-FD91727624FE@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.121.184]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <88261EB18F8C2B4495C67B46A3D95777@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: LISP mailing list list <lisp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [lisp] LISP EID Block Size
X-BeenThere: lisp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: List for the discussion of the Locator/ID Separation Protocol <lisp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/lisp>
List-Post: <mailto:lisp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp>, <mailto:lisp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 00:30:51 -0000

On Nov 3, 2013, at 2:46 PM, Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> wrote:

> 
> On 3 Nov. 2013, at 14:35 , Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> you are right. But IMHO this is one possible economic model.
>>> 
>>> What about third parties selling MR/MS services which include also PxTRs services?
>> 
>> That is exactly what I am doing (oh, well, no real customers yet, but working on that :-). For the PxTR services such a third party would then only announce the block(s) used by his own customers though. Providing free transit for the whole EID block would get kind of expensive if LISP takes off…
> 
> …. or an opportunity to have “peering” agreements with other PxTR providers ;-)

We see just this (peering) happening between LISP Service Providers in the US now.

-Darrel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email