Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Mon, 08 March 2021 14:29 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lsr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4C53A2B7C for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:29:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LHfwBSX9bw1D for <lsr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:29:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC6763A2B41 for <lsr@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 06:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.200]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4DvKrx52V6z67x2v; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:06:41 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggeme751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.97) by fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 15:11:01 +0100
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme751-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2106.2; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:11:00 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 22:11:00 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com>
CC: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
Thread-Index: AQHXD7ulQBxlBtLDvEWWPb5pr3NBAKpzKTuAgAClJqf//6/tgIACzqUAgAHcDICAAIS1gIABWHig
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:11:00 +0000
Message-ID: <cce9bf49158e439f8e6ae868cf16ec0f@huawei.com>
References: <6413094C-F1D8-4DBF-B365-E943473FDDE4@cisco.com> <BY5PR11MB433727F6D0A365B26896625DC1979@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <2021030421033728661450@foxmail.com> <BY5PR11MB43378320E0607268CA22A900C1979@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHL4ritC6x_STU4YqaXCqaWPnOZqAS8XSXiDzEGjfb35w@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hOcWh0UFJB4BMta6X9_Kv9c0Dpu3ZUbGQV324p5UYu7oA@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV2MJoJdS8VKSfQXb5t6BNs19DOPpWF_y70kw1UP+Kk+NA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV2MJoJdS8VKSfQXb5t6BNs19DOPpWF_y70kw1UP+Kk+NA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.45.186.34]
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_cce9bf49158e439f8e6ae868cf16ec0fhuaweicom_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/TnOSWfLOBig78moXhTEBYU4kJcg>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03
X-BeenThere: lsr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Link State Routing Working Group <lsr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lsr/>
List-Post: <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr>, <mailto:lsr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2021 14:29:20 -0000
Hi Gyan, Thanks for your comments. As you mentioned, both MT and MI can provide separate topologies and the topology based computation, and MI can provide separate LSDBs at some additional cost (separate adjacencies, etc.). In this document, the resource of VTN mainly refers to the forwarding plane resources, thus MT is chosen as it can provide the required functionality with less overhead. Hope this helps. Best regards, Jie From: Lsr [mailto:lsr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra Sent: Monday, March 8, 2021 7:29 AM To: Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>; Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>; Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; lsr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Topology (MT) for Segment Routing based Virtual Transport Network” - draft-xie-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt-03 Dear Authors Why was MT chosen and not MI for VTN underlay network slice underpinning. MT instances has separate topology but not separate LSDB where MI Multi instance RFC 6822 has a separate LSDB for resources isolation and I think would be a better fit for VTN underlay provisioning. MI https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6822 Thanks Gyan On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:34 AM Tony Przygienda <tonysietf@gmail.com<mailto:tonysietf@gmail.com>> wrote: Robert ruminated: That said I think perhaps we are indeed missing LROW WG (Local Routing Operations WG) where just like in GROW WG where mainly (Global) BGP operational aspects are discussed there could be good place to discuss operational aspects of link state protocols deployment and use cases. In fact perhaps it would also free some LSR bandwidth to really focus on protocol extensions. +1 IGPs grew a zoo of horns and bells by now and no'one tells the operators which spines are poisonous ;-) --- tony _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org<mailto:Lsr@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr -- [图像已被发件人删除。]<http://www.verizon.com/> Gyan Mishra Network Solutions Architect M 301 502-1347 13101 Columbia Pike Silver Spring, MD
- [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi-Top… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Qin Wu
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Huzhibo
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… duzongpeng@foxmail.com
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Huaimo Chen
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Aijun Wang
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Davey Song
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Mach Chen
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Lizhenbin
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tarek Saad
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… peng.shaofu
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… peng.shaofu
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… licong@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Ran Pang(联通集团中国联通研究院- 本部)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… lichen6@chinatelecom.cn
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gengxuesong (Geng Xuesong)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… chenhao.m@outlook.com
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Tony Przygienda
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Poll for “Using IS-IS Multi… Gyan Mishra