IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646

"Doug Ewell" <doug@ewellic.org> Thu, 25 June 2009 01:07 UTC

Return-Path: <doug@ewellic.org>
X-Original-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ltru@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06743A6D7C for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.425, BAYES_05=-1.11, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NwJlB30AONFT for <ltru@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.183]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E5A43A6D29 for <ltru@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 12721 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2009 01:06:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (67.166.27.148) by smtpauth03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.183) with ESMTP; 25 Jun 2009 01:06:51 -0000
Message-ID: <1FD45756593E470CA75417D03B45DDC9@DGBP7M81>
From: Doug Ewell <doug@ewellic.org>
To: LTRU Working Group <ltru@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.11181.1245890389.4936.ltru@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:06:49 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="utf-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Subject: Re: [Ltru] Applicability Statement for the IANA registry established by 4646
X-BeenThere: ltru@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru>
List-Post: <mailto:ltru@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:07:26 -0000

"Phillips, Addison" <addison at amazon dot com> wrote:

> I support eliminating the discussion of language negotiation 
> altogether. It really belongs in a discussion of matching.

+1

> If we must have it, it is useful to glance at RFC 4647.

+1

Mark Davis ? <mark at macchiato dot com> wrote:

> it is late in the game for such changes.

+10

--
Doug Ewell  *  Thornton, Colorado, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://www.ewellic.org
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages  ˆ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email